aiqbench analysis
This research introduces FAULT, a novel method for agentic reinforcement learning that resolves credit-assignment issues in long-horizon tasks by converting self-diagnosed errors into precise step-level learning signals. By co-evolving the policy with a self-diagnoser, the approach significantly improves signal coverage and localizes failure attribution compared to standard terminal reward methods. This advancement directly addresses critical bottlenecks in training autonomous agents capable of complex, multi-step reasoning.
My FAULT: Self-Diagnosis as Credit Assignment in Self-Evolving Agentic Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2610.01161v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful approach for training large language model agents on multi-step tasks, yet reliance on terminal outcome rewards creates two credit-assignment problems, particularly in long-horizon tasks. First, same-outcome rollout groups provide no learning signal from terminal rewards. Second, terminal rewards provide only trajectory-wide feedback, making it difficult to identify which decisions caused a failure. Recent work supplements terminal rewards with finer-grained information from trajectory analysis, such as natural-language reflections on intermediate decisions and errors. However, natural-language diagnoses are difficult to use directly for credit assignment: their error claims may be unreliable, and they do not quantify how much each error should affect learning. We propose Self-Diagnosis-guided Terminal Credit Redistribution (FAULT), which turns diagnosed errors into explicit step-level credit anchored by terminal outcomes. FAULT checks diagnostic evidence and learns relative error costs from task outcomes. During training, the policy and self-diagnoser co-evolve, while error costs are updated online from recent outcomes. On ALFWorld, FAULT recovers learning signals from same-outcome groups, reaching 95% signal coverage versus 41% for GRPO and 72% for GiGPO, while better localizing credit to specific error steps. Across two model scales, FAULT delivers strong. improvements on the long-horizon ALFWorld and WebShop tasks while remaining competitive on short-horizon Search-based QA.
Abstract:Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful approach for training large language model agents on multi-step tasks, yet reliance on terminal outcome rewards creates two credit-assignment problems, particularly in long-horizon tasks. First, same-outcome rollout groups provide no learning signal from terminal rewards. Second, terminal rewards provide only trajectory-wide feedback, making it difficult to identify which decisions caused a failure. Recent work supplements terminal rewards with finer-grained information from trajectory analysis, such as natural-language reflections on intermediate decisions and errors. However, natural-language diagnoses are difficult to use directly for credit assignment: their error claims may be unreliable, and they do not quantify how much each error should affect learning. We propose Self-Diagnosis-guided Terminal Credit Redistribution (FAULT), which turns diagnosed errors into explicit step-level credit anchored by terminal outcomes. FAULT checks diagnostic evidence and learns relative error costs from task outcomes. During training, the policy and self-diagnoser co-evolve, while error costs are updated online from recent outcomes. On ALFWorld, FAULT recovers learning signals from same-outcome groups, reaching 95% signal coverage versus 41% for GRPO and 72% for GiGPO, while better localizing credit to specific error steps. Across two model scales, FAULT delivers strong. improvements on the long-horizon ALFWorld and WebShop tasks while remaining competitive on short-horizon Search-based QA.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.01161 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.01161v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01161 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage
HarnessEvolve: Learning from Reference Trajectories for Reliable Agent Self-Evolution
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
CHIME: Credit-Aware Hierarchical Memory Evolution for Long-Horizon Agentic Planning
arXiv · Sep 3, 2026