Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Mutual information across the commensurate--incommensurate crossover and near the Kosterlitz--Thouless point of the spin-$\tfrac12$ $J_1$--$J_2$ Heisenberg chain
arXiv:2610.16915v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What quantum mutual information adds to conventional correlation functions is often unclear. We study the spin-1/2 $J_1$-$J_2$ Heisenberg chain, using DMRG on infinite chains and periodic rings and an SU(2) decomposition of the mutual information into correlation channels. For singlet ground states the two-site mutual information is an exact function of the spin correlator, so any additional content must come from blocks. In the dimerized phase, blocks resolve bond-energy correlations in the SU(2)-scalar channel without an independent asymptotic length: singlet and triplet correlation lengths agree to about 1%. The scalar channel dominates block mutual information at large distances in the commensurate regime up to $J_2/J_1=0.40$, but falls to a few percent beyond the disorder point, which coincides numerically with the Majumdar-Ghosh point $J_2/J_1=1/2$; the structure-factor peak splits only at the Lifshitz point $J_2/J_1=0.520622(2)$. On the gapless side we compare block mutual information on rings extrapolated to infinite size with the two-interval prediction of SU(2)$_1$ conformal field theory across the Kosterlitz-Thouless point $J_2/J_1=0.241167$. There, for block lengths $l\le6$, the correction decays as $l^{-p}$ with $p=1.96$-$2.07$, and any logarithmic term is at least 60 times smaller than in the Heisenberg chain. Expanding in the marginal coupling (from level spectroscopy) the first-order coefficient is consistent with $l^{-2}$ scaling and the second-order coefficient is positive for $x\le1/4$, suggesting that the mutual information relative to the field-theory value becomes stationary at the KT point for large blocks. The scalar-channel share approaches 1/4 at small cross ratio $x$, as expected from SO(4) symmetry; under two stated assumptions its first-order response to the coupling is $(3/8)\ln x-5/8$ at small $x$, matched by the $l=4$ data within 1-3% at $x\le1/9$.
Abstract:What quantum mutual information adds to conventional correlation functions is often unclear. We study the spin-1/2 $J_1$-$J_2$ Heisenberg chain, using DMRG on infinite chains and periodic rings and an SU(2) decomposition of the mutual information into correlation channels. For singlet ground states the two-site mutual information is an exact function of the spin correlator, so any additional content must come from blocks. In the dimerized phase, blocks resolve bond-energy correlations in the SU(2)-scalar channel without an independent asymptotic length: singlet and triplet correlation lengths agree to about 1%. The scalar channel dominates block mutual information at large distances in the commensurate regime up to $J_2/J_1=0.40$, but falls to a few percent beyond the disorder point, which coincides numerically with the Majumdar-Ghosh point $J_2/J_1=1/2$; the structure-factor peak splits only at the Lifshitz point $J_2/J_1=0.520622(2)$. On the gapless side we compare block mutual information on rings extrapolated to infinite size with the two-interval prediction of SU(2)$_1$ conformal field theory across the Kosterlitz-Thouless point $J_2/J_1=0.241167$. There, for block lengths $l\le6$, the correction decays as $l^{-p}$ with $p=1.96$-$2.07$, and any logarithmic term is at least 60 times smaller than in the Heisenberg chain. Expanding in the marginal coupling (from level spectroscopy) the first-order coefficient is consistent with $l^{-2}$ scaling and the second-order coefficient is positive for $x\le1/4$, suggesting that the mutual information relative to the field-theory value becomes stationary at the KT point for large blocks. The scalar-channel share approaches 1/4 at small cross ratio $x$, as expected from SO(4) symmetry; under two stated assumptions its first-order response to the coupling is $(3/8)\ln x-5/8$ at small $x$, matched by the $l=4$ data within 1-3% at $x\le1/9$.
Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
arXiv:2610.16915 [cond-mat.str-el]
(or arXiv:2610.16915v1 [cond-mat.str-el] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16915 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 370 words
Related coverage
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · Sep 2, 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026