Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.

Source coveringarXiv

Muon with Nesterov Momentum: Heavy-Tailed Noise and (Randomized) Inexact Polar Decomposition

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.06884v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Most first-order optimizers treat matrix-valued parameters as vectors, ignoring the intrinsic geometry of hidden-layer weights in neural networks. Muon addresses this mismatch by updating along the polar factor of a momentum matrix, but its theoretical understanding has lagged behind practice. In particular, practical implementations incorporate Nesterov momentum, compute the polar factor only approximately, and operate with stochastic gradients that may be heavy-tailed. We close this gap by developing a convergence theory for Muon with Nesterov momentum and inexact polar decomposition in non-convex matrix optimization under heavy-tailed noise. Our analysis builds on a unified framework for inexact polar decomposition that captures practical iterative approximations such as Newton-Schulz and quantifies how their errors propagate through the optimization dynamics. Under uniform bounds on polar errors, we establish an optimal iteration and sample complexity of $O \left(\varepsilon^{\frac{-(3\alpha-2)}{(\alpha-1)}} \right)$ for finding an $\varepsilon$-stationary point, where $\alpha\in(1,2]$~denotes the heavy-tail index. For the inexact-polar setting with $\sigma_1=0$, we also provide guarantees that do not require prior knowledge of $\alpha$. We analyze a randomized low-rank polar decomposition that is substantially more efficient than full-space methods while remaining compatible with our theory. Numerical experiments further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed inexact and randomized~variants.

Abstract:Most first-order optimizers treat matrix-valued parameters as vectors, ignoring the intrinsic geometry of hidden-layer weights in neural networks. Muon addresses this mismatch by updating along the polar factor of a momentum matrix, but its theoretical understanding has lagged behind practice. In particular, practical implementations incorporate Nesterov momentum, compute the polar factor only approximately, and operate with stochastic gradients that may be heavy-tailed. We close this gap by developing a convergence theory for Muon with Nesterov momentum and inexact polar decomposition in non-convex matrix optimization under heavy-tailed noise. Our analysis builds on a unified framework for inexact polar decomposition that captures practical iterative approximations such as Newton-Schulz and quantifies how their errors propagate through the optimization dynamics. Under uniform bounds on polar errors, we establish an optimal iteration and sample complexity of $O \left(\varepsilon^{\frac{-(3\alpha-2)}{(\alpha-1)}} \right)$ for finding an $\varepsilon$-stationary point, where $\alpha\in(1,2]$~denotes the heavy-tail index. For the inexact-polar setting with $\sigma_1=0$, we also provide guarantees that do not require prior knowledge of $\alpha$. We analyze a randomized low-rank polar decomposition that is substantially more efficient than full-space methods while remaining compatible with our theory. Numerical experiments further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed inexact and randomized~variants.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.06884 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2605.06884v2 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06884 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words