aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that the Muon optimizer fundamentally alters the edge-of-stability dynamics in large language model pretraining, decoupling loss neutrality from temporal alignment. By deriving a coherence-corrected boundary for stochastic no-momentum Muon, the study reveals distinct behaviors across different model scales that challenge classical gradient descent theories. These findings provide critical theoretical insights for optimizing training stability and efficiency in next-generation foundation models.
Muon Sublates the Edge of Stability in LLM Pretraining
arXiv:2609.34915v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Muon is increasingly used for language-model pretraining, yet its large-step dynamics are not captured by the classical edge-of-stability (EoS) picture of gradient descent (GD). In GD, loss neutrality, equal-magnitude update reversal, and marginal stability meet at a single learning-rate-dependent edge. We show that Muon breaks this coupling. For stochastic no-momentum Muon, we derive a coherence-corrected conditional loss-neutral boundary $2\rho_b/\eta$, while temporal alignment follows a separate geometry. Controlled experiments show that loss balance and temporal alignment respond differently to learning rate and batch size. Across our language model experiments, the 130M Llama-like LLM runs exhibit loss-boundary tracking with weak negative alignment, whereas the studied 1B LLM configuration shows stronger partial cancellation; in both settings, directions remain far from coherent reversal while training continues to improve. These results support a split EoS picture for Muon: a stochastic loss-neutral edge survives, but it is not accompanied by a universal temporal-direction signature. The source code for reproducing the experiments can be found in https://github.com/cyzebra/Muon-Sublates-the-Edge-of-Stability-in-LLM-Pretraining
Abstract:Muon is increasingly used for language-model pretraining, yet its large-step dynamics are not captured by the classical edge-of-stability (EoS) picture of gradient descent (GD). In GD, loss neutrality, equal-magnitude update reversal, and marginal stability meet at a single learning-rate-dependent edge. We show that Muon breaks this coupling. For stochastic no-momentum Muon, we derive a coherence-corrected conditional loss-neutral boundary $2\rho_b/\eta$, while temporal alignment follows a separate geometry. Controlled experiments show that loss balance and temporal alignment respond differently to learning rate and batch size. Across our language model experiments, the 130M Llama-like LLM runs exhibit loss-boundary tracking with weak negative alignment, whereas the studied 1B LLM configuration shows stronger partial cancellation; in both settings, directions remain far from coherent reversal while training continues to improve. These results support a split EoS picture for Muon: a stochastic loss-neutral edge survives, but it is not accompanied by a universal temporal-direction signature. The source code for reproducing the experiments can be found in this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.34915 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.34915v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34915 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words
Related coverage
Spectral Allocation: Why Muon Outperforms Adam, and How to Improve Muon
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026
Enabling DeepSeek-V4-Flash Training on AMD Instinct MI355X GPUs with Primus
AMD · Sep 3, 2026
I trained GPT-2 with full-batch gradient descent so you don't have to
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026
SOAP, Muon, and Beyond: Pushing LLM Pretraining Scales
arXiv · Jul 24, 2026