Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper challenges claimed quantum advantage on multi-objective MaxCut by showing that GPU-based quantum-annealing-inspired algorithms, which are classical, can sample solutions much faster than prior quantum processors and beat leading classical solvers on end-to-end runtime. The result is a reminder that fair comparisons must include pre- and post-processing overheads, and that "quantum advantage" claims often shift as classical methods improve. Readers should treat these as benchmark-specific results on one problem family, not a general verdict on quantum optimization.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Multi-Objective Optimization with Quantum-Annealing-Inspired Algorithms

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.26477v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Combinatorial optimization is widely regarded as a primary application for near-term quantum processors, although a definitive demonstration of the practical quantum advantage remains elusive. Recent studies have reported that both gate-based quantum circuits and quantum annealers can outperform state-of-the-art classical heuristics on multi-objective optimization (MO-MaxCut) problems. However, these studies did not fully account for the substantial pre- and post-processing overheads intrinsic to quantum solvers, leading to incomplete comparisons between quantum and classical approaches. In this work, we re-examine the same benchmark suite using GPU-based quantum-annealing-inspired algorithms (QAIAs), which, analogously to quantum processors, generate probabilistic samples and thus serve as formidable classical contenders. Our results show that QAIAs can sample candidate solutions approximately two orders of magnitude faster than previously studied quantum processors. In terms of end-to-end runtime, QAIAs also surpass industry-leading classical solvers, thereby establishing themselves as the superior performers among the quantum and classical solvers evaluated thus far for the MO-MaxCut instances.

Abstract:Combinatorial optimization is widely regarded as a primary application for near-term quantum processors, although a definitive demonstration of the practical quantum advantage remains elusive. Recent studies have reported that both gate-based quantum circuits and quantum annealers can outperform state-of-the-art classical heuristics on multi-objective optimization (MO-MaxCut) problems. However, these studies did not fully account for the substantial pre- and post-processing overheads intrinsic to quantum solvers, leading to incomplete comparisons between quantum and classical approaches. In this work, we re-examine the same benchmark suite using GPU-based quantum-annealing-inspired algorithms (QAIAs), which, analogously to quantum processors, generate probabilistic samples and thus serve as formidable classical contenders. Our results show that QAIAs can sample candidate solutions approximately two orders of magnitude faster than previously studied quantum processors. In terms of end-to-end runtime, QAIAs also surpass industry-leading classical solvers, thereby establishing themselves as the superior performers among the quantum and classical solvers evaluated thus far for the MO-MaxCut instances.

arXiv:2604.26477 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2604.26477v3 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.26477 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words

Related coverage