Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Multi-Domain Physics-Based MDO of Multirotor UAVs: A Deterministic Framework for Discrete COTS Sizing

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.22768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design is governed by a tightly coupled system of non-linear equations spanning structural mechanics, electrochemistry, aerodynamics, and kinematics. Solved sequentially, a miscalibrated sub-model coefficient triggers a mass-compounding cascade failure--the Mass Snowball effect. This paper presents AeroEval, a physics-based, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) engine that simultaneously resolves all subsystem couplings and maps continuous sizing optima to physically purchasable, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. The MDO engine is validated under a strict calibrate/test protocol that eliminates circularity: three structural/packaging coefficients are fitted on a held-out cohort of 20 do-it-yourself (DIY) and legacy platforms, then frozen and evaluated blind on 19 modern commercial drone platforms spanning 377 g to 76 kg. On the commercial test cohort the engine predicts Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) within 7.2% Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), with a mean complexity factor $k \approx 1.05 \pm 0.08$ and $\text{RMSE}_{\text{MTOW}} = 1.59$ kg; the DIY calibration cohort, characterized by high build variability, yields 26.1% MAPE. Battery mass is predicted within 7.9% on single-pack platforms, with a disclosed systematic underprediction on redundant multi-battery enterprise platforms. A 14-parameter sensitivity suite of >300 simulations quantifies partial derivatives of takeoff mass and flight time; forward velocity diverges beyond 25.5 m/s due to cubic parasite power growth. The path-dependent mass-shedding model for agricultural and delivery roles reduces structural frame mass by up to 40.6% and energy capacity by 33.7% relative to static baselines. Typical solver convergence requires 25-50 iterations, completing in under 50 ms on a standard desktop CPU.

Abstract:Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design is governed by a tightly coupled system of non-linear equations spanning structural mechanics, electrochemistry, aerodynamics, and kinematics. Solved sequentially, a miscalibrated sub-model coefficient triggers a mass-compounding cascade failure--the Mass Snowball effect. This paper presents AeroEval, a physics-based, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) engine that simultaneously resolves all subsystem couplings and maps continuous sizing optima to physically purchasable, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. The MDO engine is validated under a strict calibrate/test protocol that eliminates circularity: three structural/packaging coefficients are fitted on a held-out cohort of 20 do-it-yourself (DIY) and legacy platforms, then frozen and evaluated blind on 19 modern commercial drone platforms spanning 377 g to 76 kg. On the commercial test cohort the engine predicts Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) within 7.2% Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), with a mean complexity factor $k \approx 1.05 \pm 0.08$ and $\text{RMSE}_{\text{MTOW}} = 1.59$ kg; the DIY calibration cohort, characterized by high build variability, yields 26.1% MAPE. Battery mass is predicted within 7.9% on single-pack platforms, with a disclosed systematic underprediction on redundant multi-battery enterprise platforms. A 14-parameter sensitivity suite of >300 simulations quantifies partial derivatives of takeoff mass and flight time; forward velocity diverges beyond 25.5 m/s due to cubic parasite power growth. The path-dependent mass-shedding model for agricultural and delivery roles reduces structural frame mass by up to 40.6% and energy capacity by 33.7% relative to static baselines. Typical solver convergence requires 25-50 iterations, completing in under 50 ms on a standard desktop CPU.

Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

arXiv:2607.22768 [cs.CE]

(or arXiv:2607.22768v1 [cs.CE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22768 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 350 words

Related coverage