aiqbench analysis
This study evaluates retrieval-based in-context learning strategies for detecting criminally relevant defamatory posts, finding that model architecture significantly outperforms specific prompting techniques like few-shot or retrieval-augmented approaches. Despite improvements over zero-shot methods, the models still miss a substantial portion of relevant cases and tend to over-predict criminal relevance, limiting their utility to triage rather than autonomous moderation. The research highlights critical gaps in current AI systems for legal compliance and safety on social media platforms.
MUCnoHARM@GermEval Shared Task 2026: Retrieval-based In-Context Learning for Defamatory Offences, and Where It Falls Short
arXiv:2609.09791v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With hate speech being ubiquitous online, automatic detection is crucial, in particular when it comes to criminally relevant social media posts. We study a variety of retrieval-based in-context learning (RetICL) strategies for detecting defamatory offences under {\S}{\S} 185-187 StGB (the subject of GermEval 2026 Subtask 4). Few-shot prompting beats zero-shot, but retrieval-based approaches offer only marginal gains over random demonstrations, and even fall behind an optimised static set of demonstrations. Providing concrete legal knowledge helps, yet model choice outweighs every other system choice. Models over-predict criminal relevance while still missing 26-57% of criminally relevant posts, suiting them for triage rather than autonomous moderation.
Abstract:With hate speech being ubiquitous online, automatic detection is crucial, in particular when it comes to criminally relevant social media posts. We study a variety of retrieval-based in-context learning (RetICL) strategies for detecting defamatory offences under §§ 185-187 StGB (the subject of GermEval 2026 Subtask 4). Few-shot prompting beats zero-shot, but retrieval-based approaches offer only marginal gains over random demonstrations, and even fall behind an optimised static set of demonstrations. Providing concrete legal knowledge helps, yet model choice outweighs every other system choice. Models over-predict criminal relevance while still missing 26-57% of criminally relevant posts, suiting them for triage rather than autonomous moderation.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.09791 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.09791v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09791 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 198 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026

How Conversational AI Chatbots Work in 2026
Slack Blog · Sep 28, 2026