aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a reinforcement learning-based selector within the MLIR compilation pipeline to optimize quantum circuit fidelity, scheduling latency, and compilation time simultaneously. By unifying device selection, compiler-pass optimization, and job scheduling into a cohesive framework, the approach addresses critical fragmentation issues in current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) software stacks. The work represents a significant step toward adaptive, high-fidelity workflows essential for bridging classical and quantum computing infrastructures.
MQSS-Selector: RL-Guided Pass Selection for an MLIR Compilation Pipeline
arXiv:2609.30104v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High Performance Computing (HPC) and Quantum Computing (QC) systems are increasingly converging towards unified High Performance Computing-Quantum Computing (HPCQC) infrastructures, driven by a growing need to bridge classical and quantum workflows, which affects all levels of the system stack, from the hardware to compilers and runtimes, all the way to applications. However, today's QC devices are still in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, are error-prone and resource-limited, and therefore require specialized optimizations and topology mappings to achieve sufficient fidelity. This places special emphasis on proper compilation and optimization within the overall quantum software stack. Many existing stacks remain fragmented, with separate components responsible for device selection, compiler-pass optimization, and job queue scheduling. This paper proposes a unified, learning-based selector that integrates these disparate stages into a cohesive framework. Our proposed selector scheme leverages reinforcement learning and deep learning models that can be extended to simultaneously optimize multiple objectives -- such as fidelity, compilation time, and scheduling latency -- while dynamically adapting to circuit characteristics and device conditions.
Abstract:High Performance Computing (HPC) and Quantum Computing (QC) systems are increasingly converging towards unified High Performance Computing-Quantum Computing (HPCQC) infrastructures, driven by a growing need to bridge classical and quantum workflows, which affects all levels of the system stack, from the hardware to compilers and runtimes, all the way to applications. However, today's QC devices are still in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, are error-prone and resource-limited, and therefore require specialized optimizations and topology mappings to achieve sufficient fidelity. This places special emphasis on proper compilation and optimization within the overall quantum software stack. Many existing stacks remain fragmented, with separate components responsible for device selection, compiler-pass optimization, and job queue scheduling. This paper proposes a unified, learning-based selector that integrates these disparate stages into a cohesive framework. Our proposed selector scheme leverages reinforcement learning and deep learning models that can be extended to simultaneously optimize multiple objectives -- such as fidelity, compilation time, and scheduling latency -- while dynamically adapting to circuit characteristics and device conditions.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Programming Languages (cs.PL)
D.3.4; I.2.6; I.2.8; C.1.3
arXiv:2609.30104 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.30104v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30104 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words
Related coverage
Enabling DeepSeek-V4-Flash Training on AMD Instinct MI355X GPUs with Primus
AMD · Sep 3, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

How to Repoint dbt ETL Pipelines to Databricks
Databricks · Oct 6, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026