aiqbench analysis
This article introduces MPIB, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the clinical safety of Large Language Models against prompt injection attacks in medical settings. By distinguishing between direct user queries and indirect RAG-mediated injections, it provides critical metrics like Clinical Harm Event Rate (CHER) to assess high-severity risks in healthcare workflows. The study highlights significant divergences in current defense configurations when exposed to adversarial instructions embedded within retrieved context versus user input.
MPIB: A Benchmark for Medical Prompt Injection Attacks and Clinical Safety in LLMs
arXiv:2602.06268v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly integrated into clinical workflows. However, prompt injection attacks can steer these systems toward clinically unsafe or misleading outputs. We introduce the Medical Prompt Injection Benchmark (MPIB), a dataset-and-benchmark suite for evaluating clinical safety under both direct prompt injection and indirect, RAG-mediated injection across clinically grounded tasks. MPIB emphasizes outcome-level risk via the Clinical Harm Event Rate (CHER), which measures high-severity clinical harm events under a clinically grounded taxonomy, and reports CHER alongside ASR$_2$ to distinguish moderate-or-worse from high-severity outcomes. The benchmark comprises 9,697 curated instances constructed through multi-stage quality gates and clinical safety linting. Evaluating MPIB across a diverse set of baseline LLMs and defense configurations, we find that ASR$_2$ and CHER$_3$ can diverge substantially, and that observed rates vary depending on whether adversarial instructions appear in the user query or in retrieved context. The MPIB dataset and evaluation code are available on Hugging Face and GitHub, respectively.
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly integrated into clinical workflows. However, prompt injection attacks can steer these systems toward clinically unsafe or misleading outputs. We introduce the Medical Prompt Injection Benchmark (MPIB), a dataset-and-benchmark suite for evaluating clinical safety under both direct prompt injection and indirect, RAG-mediated injection across clinically grounded tasks. MPIB emphasizes outcome-level risk via the Clinical Harm Event Rate (CHER), which measures high-severity clinical harm events under a clinically grounded taxonomy, and reports CHER alongside ASR$_2$ to distinguish moderate-or-worse from high-severity outcomes. The benchmark comprises 9,697 curated instances constructed through multi-stage quality gates and clinical safety linting. Evaluating MPIB across a diverse set of baseline LLMs and defense configurations, we find that ASR$_2$ and CHER$_3$ can diverge substantially, and that observed rates vary depending on whether adversarial instructions appear in the user query or in retrieved context. The MPIB dataset and evaluation code are available on Hugging Face and GitHub, respectively.
19 pages, 7 figures, 18 tables. Accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2602.06268 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2602.06268v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.06268 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
HealthLoopQA: A Context-Aware Question Answering Benchmark for Interpreting Wearable Monitoring Data in Diabetes Care
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026