Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that whole slide image foundation models can effectively extract morphology signals to automatically triage cancer diagnostic slides, reducing the need for manual curation by pathologists. By ranking images based on zero-shot classification predictions, the study identifies tumor-containing slides within the top two results even when patients have up to 43 total slides. This advancement addresses data dilution issues in training datasets and streamlines downstream tasks like recurrence risk estimation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Morphology signal in whole slide image foundation models can automatically triage slides

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.01987v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Patient exams in the cancer diagnosis and staging process typically generate several whole slide images (WSIs). One of the initial steps in training models on WSI data is identifying one or a few slides containing tumor or other diagnostic biomarkers necessary for downstream prediction tasks such as estimating recurrence risk or progression-free survival. This step requires tedious manual curation by experienced pathologists. Many published datasets make the artificial assumption of 1 slide per patient. Alternatively, all slides per patient may be used for model training, which may dilute the signal from the few slides containing tumor or other relevant information. In this paper, we present a pipeline to overcome these challenges using publicly available WSI foundation models (FMs). Our evaluations show that ranking WSIs based on predictions from zero-shot classification using WSI FMs accurately identifies slides with the most tumor, indicating that WSI FMs contain sufficient morphology signal to automatically triage slides. We also present a formulation for ranked evaluation to benchmark FM performance in slide triage. We show, on multiple datasets, that tumor slides are identified in the top-2 ranked slides for patients with up to 43 slides.

Authors:Ayushi Sinha, Shashank Yadav, Benjamin Holmes, Pravat Das, Aaron W. Bogan, James S. Lewis Jr., Santiago Romero-Brufau, Andrew Y. K. Foong, Scott H. Kaufmann, Kathryn M. Van Abel, David M. Routman, Michael R. Lucas

Abstract:Patient exams in the cancer diagnosis and staging process typically generate several whole slide images (WSIs). One of the initial steps in training models on WSI data is identifying one or a few slides containing tumor or other diagnostic biomarkers necessary for downstream prediction tasks such as estimating recurrence risk or progression-free survival. This step requires tedious manual curation by experienced pathologists. Many published datasets make the artificial assumption of 1 slide per patient. Alternatively, all slides per patient may be used for model training, which may dilute the signal from the few slides containing tumor or other relevant information. In this paper, we present a pipeline to overcome these challenges using publicly available WSI foundation models (FMs). Our evaluations show that ranking WSIs based on predictions from zero-shot classification using WSI FMs accurately identifies slides with the most tumor, indicating that WSI FMs contain sufficient morphology signal to automatically triage slides. We also present a formulation for ranked evaluation to benchmark FM performance in slide triage. We show, on multiple datasets, that tumor slides are identified in the top-2 ranked slides for patients with up to 43 slides.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.01987 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.01987v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01987 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage