aiqbench analysis
This study reveals critical limitations in Mixture-of-Experts state-space models, demonstrating that increasing expert count often triggers inverse scaling rather than improved expressivity. The research highlights how standard operator-level mixing can fail to capture complex dynamical geometries, leading to misleading performance gains driven by temporal smoothing instead of faithful regime adaptation. These findings underscore the necessity for geometry-aware evaluation protocols when developing models for heterogeneous time series dynamics.
More Experts, Worse Dynamics: Inverse Scaling and Spectral Bias in Mixture-of-Experts State-Space Models
arXiv:2608.21840v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are commonly motivated as a way to increase expressivity by decomposing complex systems into simpler local dynamics. This intuition has recently been extended to spectral state-space models, where mixing stable operators is assumed to enable adaptation to heterogeneous or regime-switching time series. We critically evaluate this assumption in a controlled synthetic setting designed to isolate dynamical rather than representational challenges. We study a next-step prediction task on sequences composed of three regimes: chaotic dynamics generated by the Mackey-Glass system, a stable oscillatory regime, and a noise-dominated autoregressive regime. Across extensive ablations including capacity scaling, oracle routing, frozen-expert variants, and comparisons to output-level MoE baselines, operator-level mixture models consistently fail to outperform a single-expert baseline. Increasing the number of experts leads to inverse scaling, routing collapses or fails to induce meaningful specialization, and even perfect regime supervision does not prevent degradation in global performance. Furthermore, we show that apparent improvements in mean squared error on chaotic trajectories can be misleading. Phase-space analysis reveals that lower error often arises from temporal smoothing that destroys the geometry of the underlying attractor rather than from faithful modeling of the dynamics. These results identify a likely limitation of operator interpolation under the studied parameterization and training protocol, and underscore the need for geometry-aware evaluation when assessing regime-switching dynamical systems.
Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are commonly motivated as a way to increase expressivity by decomposing complex systems into simpler local dynamics. This intuition has recently been extended to spectral state-space models, where mixing stable operators is assumed to enable adaptation to heterogeneous or regime-switching time series. We critically evaluate this assumption in a controlled synthetic setting designed to isolate dynamical rather than representational challenges. We study a next-step prediction task on sequences composed of three regimes: chaotic dynamics generated by the Mackey-Glass system, a stable oscillatory regime, and a noise-dominated autoregressive regime. Across extensive ablations including capacity scaling, oracle routing, frozen-expert variants, and comparisons to output-level MoE baselines, operator-level mixture models consistently fail to outperform a single-expert baseline. Increasing the number of experts leads to inverse scaling, routing collapses or fails to induce meaningful specialization, and even perfect regime supervision does not prevent degradation in global performance. Furthermore, we show that apparent improvements in mean squared error on chaotic trajectories can be misleading. Phase-space analysis reveals that lower error often arises from temporal smoothing that destroys the geometry of the underlying attractor rather than from faithful modeling of the dynamics. These results identify a likely limitation of operator interpolation under the studied parameterization and training protocol, and underscore the need for geometry-aware evaluation when assessing regime-switching dynamical systems.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.21840 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.21840v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21840 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words
