aiqbench analysis
MORA addresses the critical challenge of distinguishing genuine anomalies from natural distribution drift in non-stationary time-series data without requiring online adaptation or labeled shifts. By reconstructing local targets through paired short- and long-term views, the framework provides a conservative correction mechanism that preserves sensitivity to true anomalies while ignoring contextual evolution. This approach offers a robust solution for deploying ML models in dynamic environments where historical patterns inevitably change over time.
MORA: Modeling Observed Changes for Drift-Robust Time-Series Anomaly Detection
arXiv:2610.09473v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) identifies deviations from patterns learned from historical data. In non-stationary settings, distribution drift and true anomalies can cause similar local changes, making it difficult to tell whether a deviation reflects abnormality or evolving context. Existing methods typically adapt to detected shifts or learn drift-insensitive representations, but do not resolve this ambiguity. We define this problem as \emph{temporal change disambiguation}: determining whether a local deviation is explained by broader temporal evolution. We introduce MORA, a drift-robust TSAD framework that reconstructs the same local target from paired short- and long-term views. The reconstruction gap measures contextual support for a local deviation, and a data-dependent correction mechanism conservatively adjusts the primary local anomaly score. Context can only reduce the score when it improves reconstruction of the same target. MORA needs neither drift annotations nor online adaptation. Experiments on four TSAD benchmarks show strong robustness to non-stationarity while preserving sensitivity to genuine anomalies.
Abstract:Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) identifies deviations from patterns learned from historical data. In non-stationary settings, distribution drift and true anomalies can cause similar local changes, making it difficult to tell whether a deviation reflects abnormality or evolving context. Existing methods typically adapt to detected shifts or learn drift-insensitive representations, but do not resolve this ambiguity. We define this problem as \emph{temporal change disambiguation}: determining whether a local deviation is explained by broader temporal evolution. We introduce MORA, a drift-robust TSAD framework that reconstructs the same local target from paired short- and long-term views. The reconstruction gap measures contextual support for a local deviation, and a data-dependent correction mechanism conservatively adjusts the primary local anomaly score. Context can only reduce the score when it improves reconstruction of the same target. MORA needs neither drift annotations nor online adaptation. Experiments on four TSAD benchmarks show strong robustness to non-stationarity while preserving sensitivity to genuine anomalies.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.09473 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.09473v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09473 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words
Related coverage

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · Jun 15, 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026