aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a neural semi-discrete method for solving high-dimensional Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, leveraging policy iteration and shifted network queries to avoid traditional tensor grids. The approach provides rigorous error bounds and stability guarantees for learned dynamics in control problems with up to 1024 dimensions, bridging numerical analysis and deep learning optimization.
Monotone Neural Policy Iteration for High-Dimensional First-Order Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman Equations
arXiv:2605.07116v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We analyze a neural semi-discrete method for high-dimensional first-order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations with known or learned dynamics. Centered differences and an artificial viscosity $Nh=O(h)$ define a monotone operator evaluated through $2d+1$ shifted network queries; policy iteration solves the resulting Bellman equation without a tensor grid. At fixed $h$, the sharp componentwise condition $\max_i|f_i|\le2N$ turns every frozen-policy operator into a nearest-neighbor Markov-chain generator with a policy-independent total jump rate. Uniformization gives whole-space well-posedness for measurable feedbacks, an explicit Poisson-tail bound on the numerical domain of dependence, and boundary-free localization. The representation also yields a posteriori policy-evaluation bounds that account for residual and learned-model errors. A greedy-gap analysis controls inexact policy iteration at fixed $h$; a separate consistency estimate connects the semi-discrete equation to the continuous HJB equation. Experiments reproduce the extremal tail, show rates consistent with $O(\sqrt h)$ and nearly $h$-independent exact-policy-iteration decay, and assess empirical estimator effectivity. A nonsmooth example shows that the continuous residual can miss a non-viscosity solution, whereas the shifted residual detects the defect. Further tests provide a structured interval-verified certificate calibration, an early-budget benefit of policy freezing for bang-bang control, and learned-dynamics diagnostics. A structured nonlinear problem with active compact-control constraints is tested against a manufactured semi-discrete reference through $d=1024$.
Abstract:We analyze a neural semi-discrete method for high-dimensional first-order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equations with known or learned dynamics. Centered differences and an artificial viscosity $Nh=O(h)$ define a monotone operator evaluated through $2d+1$ shifted network queries; policy iteration solves the resulting Bellman equation without a tensor grid. At fixed $h$, the sharp componentwise condition $\max_i|f_i|\le2N$ turns every frozen-policy operator into a nearest-neighbor Markov-chain generator with a policy-independent total jump rate. Uniformization gives whole-space well-posedness for measurable feedbacks, an explicit Poisson-tail bound on the numerical domain of dependence, and boundary-free localization. The representation also yields a posteriori policy-evaluation bounds that account for residual and learned-model errors. A greedy-gap analysis controls inexact policy iteration at fixed $h$; a separate consistency estimate connects the semi-discrete equation to the continuous HJB equation. Experiments reproduce the extremal tail, show rates consistent with $O(\sqrt h)$ and nearly $h$-independent exact-policy-iteration decay, and assess empirical estimator effectivity. A nonsmooth example shows that the continuous residual can miss a non-viscosity solution, whereas the shifted residual detects the defect. Further tests provide a structured interval-verified certificate calibration, an early-budget benefit of policy freezing for bang-bang control, and learned-dynamics diagnostics. A structured nonlinear problem with active compact-control constraints is tested against a manufactured semi-discrete reference through $d=1024$.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2605.07116 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.07116v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.07116 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

How Does Changing the Elo of a Chess Transformer Affect its Computations?
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

Skydio CEO Adam Bry on why Silicon Valley shouldn’t draw red lines for drone use
The Verge · Jun 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026