aiqbench analysis
This arXiv study probes which inputs steer small open-weight LLMs in synthetic earnings-forecast prompts. Its main finding is that commentary tone and 20-day momentum often shift model answers as much as or more than the EPS surprise, and the authors explicitly limit the claims to observable input reliance and numerical recognition, not internal reasoning or real return predictability. For AI readers, the useful takeaway is the controlled, reproducible design (public prompts and results) as a template for testing LLM sensitivity to spurious cues in high-stakes domains.
Momentum, Commentary Tone, and Earnings Surprise in LLM Financial Forecasts
arXiv:2610.22043v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Which inputs drive a language model's financial forecast? We construct synthetic earnings announcements that independently reverse 20-day momentum, non-informational commentary tone, and whether fixed actual EPS beats a manipulated consensus. Six instruction/chat checkpoint conversions from four families (0.49-7.61B base parameters) receive 2,016 prompts each under a direct-answer Q8_0 protocol. The design includes 24 numerical blocks, six commentary pairs, profits and losses, rising and falling annual EPS, and two surprise sizes. Both A/B answer assignments and U/D cover all 384 primary scenarios per conversion. We estimate matched changes in conditional answer-prefix scores, not calibrated market probabilities. Across these checkpoints, the primary EPS contrast ranges from -0.19 to 86.80 percentage points. The magnitude of the primary signed tone contrast exceeds that of EPS in 5 of six models, and momentum exceeds it in 5. Natural-word numerical diagnostic accuracy ranges from 51.0 to 95.8 percent. Answer-encoding, wording, context, and conversion controls qualify these results. The experiment measures observable input reliance and numerical recognition; it establishes neither an internal reasoning mechanism nor realized return predictability. Public benchmark prompts, recorded scores, and an interactive recorded-results explorer accompany the study.
Abstract:Which inputs drive a language model's financial forecast? We construct synthetic earnings announcements that independently reverse 20-day momentum, non-informational commentary tone, and whether fixed actual EPS beats a manipulated consensus. Six instruction/chat checkpoint conversions from four families (0.49-7.61B base parameters) receive 2,016 prompts each under a direct-answer Q8_0 protocol. The design includes 24 numerical blocks, six commentary pairs, profits and losses, rising and falling annual EPS, and two surprise sizes. Both A/B answer assignments and U/D cover all 384 primary scenarios per conversion. We estimate matched changes in conditional answer-prefix scores, not calibrated market probabilities. Across these checkpoints, the primary EPS contrast ranges from -0.19 to 86.80 percentage points. The magnitude of the primary signed tone contrast exceeds that of EPS in 5 of six models, and momentum exceeds it in 5. Natural-word numerical diagnostic accuracy ranges from 51.0 to 95.8 percent. Answer-encoding, wording, context, and conversion controls qualify these results. The experiment measures observable input reliance and numerical recognition; it establishes neither an internal reasoning mechanism nor realized return predictability. Public benchmark prompts, recorded scores, and an interactive recorded-results explorer accompany the study.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); General Finance (q-fin.GN)
arXiv:2610.22043 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.22043v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22043 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage

Futures Drop, Yields And Oil Jump Ahead Of Iran UN Address As Trump - Xi Summit Looms
zerohedge.com · Sep 23, 2026

Tech Hits a Wall & Netflix Plunges | The Motley Fool
fool.com · Jul 25, 2026

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · Sep 2, 2026

Netskope (NTSK) Q2 2027 Earnings Call Transcript
fool.com · Sep 10, 2026