aiqbench analysis
This paper advances the theoretical understanding of constant-step stochastic approximation by establishing moment-accurate Gaussian mixtures that capture tail behaviors missed by standard weak convergence analyses. By matching stationary energy with local Ornstein-Uhlenbeck limits, the authors provide sharper error bounds for observable covariances and expected losses in SGD dynamics. These results offer a more rigorous foundation for predicting model behavior across different step sizes and geometries without relying on asymptotic approximations that ignore quadratic tail mass.
Moment-Accurate Gaussian Mixtures for Constant-Step Stochastic Approximation
arXiv:2610.05595v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Local Gaussian models of constant-step learning predict output variability and expected losses, but weak convergence alone does not justify these moment predictions. We establish moment-accurate Gaussian mixtures by matching stationary energy with local Ornstein--Uhlenbeck limits, ruling out quadratic tail mass invisible to weak convergence. For step size $a$, the second-order Wasserstein error is $o(\sqrt a)$, uniformly over invariant laws, using each law's actual root weights. The assumptions combine confinement, descent, finitely many hyperbolic equilibria and root continuity with finite-variance innovations. The result yields observable covariances, expected objective gaps and first-order mean shifts, while allowing singular covariances, compatible saddles and weights without a limit. For additive noise given by a fixed invertible transform of independent standardized Student $t_3$ coordinates, symmetry gives an order-sharp $\sqrt a$ smooth-test bound. Numerical transport calculations demonstrate the value of root-specific covariances; controlled SGD studies assess observable predictions across step sizes, batch sizes and model geometries.
Abstract:Local Gaussian models of constant-step learning predict output variability and expected losses, but weak convergence alone does not justify these moment predictions. We establish moment-accurate Gaussian mixtures by matching stationary energy with local Ornstein--Uhlenbeck limits, ruling out quadratic tail mass invisible to weak convergence. For step size $a$, the second-order Wasserstein error is $o(\sqrt a)$, uniformly over invariant laws, using each law's actual root weights. The assumptions combine confinement, descent, finitely many hyperbolic equilibria and root continuity with finite-variance innovations. The result yields observable covariances, expected objective gaps and first-order mean shifts, while allowing singular covariances, compatible saddles and weights without a limit. For additive noise given by a fixed invertible transform of independent standardized Student $t_3$ coordinates, symmetry gives an order-sharp $\sqrt a$ smooth-test bound. Numerical transport calculations demonstrate the value of root-specific covariances; controlled SGD studies assess observable predictions across step sizes, batch sizes and model geometries.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.05595 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.05595v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05595 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026
Gaussian Limits for SGD Without Stationary Moments
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026

Princeton University Defines Limits of Accurate Quantum Filtering
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 10, 2026