aiqbench analysis
This research investigates how user behaviors like adaptivity and collectivity can exploit theoretical gaps in machine unlearning to alter AI model behavior when exercising the "right to erasure." By applying data valuation techniques, the study demonstrates that coordinated deletion requests can significantly impact model performance in computer vision tasks, offering new insights into the security and robustness of training pipelines.
Modeling Deletion Requests in Machine Unlearning
arXiv:2610.04310v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning is seen as a promising approach to enable users to exercise the "right to erasure" in the context of AI models. We ask how users might influence the behavior of models when exercising this right. We define two types of behaviors that users might adopt when requesting the deletion of their data: adaptivity and collectivity. Drawing connections between the goals of users in this context and results in stochastic optimization, we demonstrate theoretical gaps between the potential effects of groups of users who do and do not display these behaviors. We then show how techniques from data valuation might be used to design deletion requesters that can significantly alter model behavior in realistic settings. In experiments on computer vision tasks, we demonstrate the differential effects of different models of user behavior and attempt to isolate the impacts of adaptivity and collectivity.
Abstract:Machine unlearning is seen as a promising approach to enable users to exercise the "right to erasure" in the context of AI models. We ask how users might influence the behavior of models when exercising this right. We define two types of behaviors that users might adopt when requesting the deletion of their data: adaptivity and collectivity. Drawing connections between the goals of users in this context and results in stochastic optimization, we demonstrate theoretical gaps between the potential effects of groups of users who do and do not display these behaviors. We then show how techniques from data valuation might be used to design deletion requesters that can significantly alter model behavior in realistic settings. In experiments on computer vision tasks, we demonstrate the differential effects of different models of user behavior and attempt to isolate the impacts of adaptivity and collectivity.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2610.04310 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.04310v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04310 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words
Related coverage
On Unlearning for Time-series Forecasting
arXiv · Oct 5, 2026
Counterfactual Certification for Sequential Unlearning with Long-Run Performance Guarantees
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
Bounding Retraining Equivalence and the Deletion Floor in Materials Machine Unlearning
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Why Forget-Only Unlearning Needs Memorization
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026