aiqbench analysis
MixDetect advances AI detection by offering granular word-level localization of edits rather than just binary authorship labels or aggregate scores. This capability allows researchers to separately quantify the scope and intensity of AI interventions, providing deeper insight into how models modify human text. The framework demonstrates robustness across different domains and generators, marking a significant step forward in analyzing mixed-authorship content.
MixDetect: Word-Level Localization and Quantification of AI Editing
arXiv:2609.32625v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to edit human-written text rather than generate entire texts from scratch. Conventional AI-text detectors mainly distinguish human-written from fully AI-generated text, while recent methods for AI-edited text typically provide only a text-level label or editing-degree score. We introduce MixDetect, a word-level framework for localizing and quantifying AI editing. MixDetect separately predicts whether each word has been edited and, conditional on editing, how substantial the edit is, allowing editing scope and editing intensity to be estimated separately. During training, source--edited pairs are aligned to construct word-level supervision, while inference requires only the input text. Experiments show that MixDetect accurately localizes AI-edited words, reflects differences in editing intensity, and reveals different scope--intensity patterns across editing degrees and operations. The overall AI editing magnitude increases under additional AI editing, decreases when AI-generated text is edited by humans, and remains nearly unchanged under ordinary human-to-human editing. The aggregated text-level predictions also perform well on binary and ternary AI-text classification and remain effective under domain and generator shifts. These results show that AI editing can be analyzed beyond a single authorship label or editing-degree score by identifying both where AI editing occurs and how substantial the edits are.
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used to edit human-written text rather than generate entire texts from scratch. Conventional AI-text detectors mainly distinguish human-written from fully AI-generated text, while recent methods for AI-edited text typically provide only a text-level label or editing-degree score. We introduce MixDetect, a word-level framework for localizing and quantifying AI editing. MixDetect separately predicts whether each word has been edited and, conditional on editing, how substantial the edit is, allowing editing scope and editing intensity to be estimated separately. During training, source--edited pairs are aligned to construct word-level supervision, while inference requires only the input text. Experiments show that MixDetect accurately localizes AI-edited words, reflects differences in editing intensity, and reveals different scope--intensity patterns across editing degrees and operations. The overall AI editing magnitude increases under additional AI editing, decreases when AI-generated text is edited by humans, and remains nearly unchanged under ordinary human-to-human editing. The aggregated text-level predictions also perform well on binary and ternary AI-text classification and remain effective under domain and generator shifts. These results show that AI editing can be analyzed beyond a single authorship label or editing-degree score by identifying both where AI editing occurs and how substantial the edits are.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.32625 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.32625v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32625 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 294 words
Related coverage

Below the Frontier: The Battle for Good-Enough AI
LessWrong · Oct 13, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Inside our months-long investigation into Kevin O’Leary’s Utah data center debacle
The Verge · Oct 1, 2026

Honest Abacus AI Review: ChatLLM, DeepAgent, AI Studio & More
KDnuggets · Aug 4, 2026