aiqbench analysis
This research addresses critical representation gaps in amortized Bayesian inference by introducing auxiliary supervision to stabilize training dynamics across varying data regimes. By formalizing these gaps as local optima at the network's information bottleneck, the authors provide a generic diagnostic and solution that enhances both convergence speed and accuracy without requiring problem-specific fixes. The work advances the practical reliability of neural density estimation for complex statistical models where traditional methods fail.
Mitigating Representation Gaps in Amortized Bayesian Inference with Auxiliary Supervision
arXiv:2609.39525v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Casting Bayesian inference as a neural network optimization problem targeting an amortized posterior is attractive, as it extends to otherwise intractable statistical models and offers near instantaneous inference for new datasets after prepaying the training cost. Although theory guarantees faithfulness under ideal convergence, practical amortized inference still requires iterating over architectures and optimization choices and ultimately ``satisficing'' under finite simulation, compute, and time budgets. Even the best-performing solution may thus retain avoidable representation gaps that typically require problem-specific fixes. Here, we propose a generic alternative which improves training dynamics with auxiliary guidance losses applied to internal representations. Specifically, we show how such guidance leads to faster convergence when training data is abundant and to better performance when it is scarce. We formalize representation gaps as getting stuck in a local optimum at the information bottleneck between the parts of the network tasked with feature learning and those tasked with conditional distribution learning, and offer a generic diagnostic to separate summary failures from inference failures. Finally, we demonstrate that auxiliary supervision improves convergence speed and accuracy on a range of challenging real-world inference problems.
Abstract:Casting Bayesian inference as a neural network optimization problem targeting an amortized posterior is attractive, as it extends to otherwise intractable statistical models and offers near instantaneous inference for new datasets after prepaying the training cost. Although theory guarantees faithfulness under ideal convergence, practical amortized inference still requires iterating over architectures and optimization choices and ultimately ``satisficing'' under finite simulation, compute, and time budgets. Even the best-performing solution may thus retain avoidable representation gaps that typically require problem-specific fixes. Here, we propose a generic alternative which improves training dynamics with auxiliary guidance losses applied to internal representations. Specifically, we show how such guidance leads to faster convergence when training data is abundant and to better performance when it is scarce. We formalize representation gaps as getting stuck in a local optimum at the information bottleneck between the parts of the network tasked with feature learning and those tasked with conditional distribution learning, and offer a generic diagnostic to separate summary failures from inference failures. Finally, we demonstrate that auxiliary supervision improves convergence speed and accuracy on a range of challenging real-world inference problems.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation (stat.CO); Methodology (stat.ME)
arXiv:2609.39525 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.39525v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39525 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 284 words
Related coverage
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026
DFlash Speculative Decoding on AMD Instinct MI355X: Up to 5× Faster Qwen3.5 Inference
AMD · Sep 16, 2026