Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This survey provides a unified analytical framework for mitigating hallucinations in LLMs by categorizing errors into knowledge-based and logic-based types. It systematically evaluates technical paradigms such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), reasoning enhancement, and their integration within agentic systems to improve reliability. The work is essential for researchers seeking to understand the underlying mechanisms connecting specific capability dimensions with distinct hallucination categories.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models: A Capability-Oriented Survey on RAG, Reasoning, and Agentic Systems

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.24476v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Hallucination remains one of the key obstacles to the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs). Although various mitigation approaches have been proposed, existing studies often analyze different technical paradigms independently, lacking a unified perspective to understand the underlying mechanisms of different approaches and their correspondence with different types of hallucinations. This survey adopts a capability enhancement perspective to systematically examine hallucination mitigation approaches, focusing on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), reasoning enhancement, and their integration within agentic systems. Based on their primary mitigation mechanisms, we categorize hallucinations into knowledge-based hallucinations and logic-based hallucinations, analyze how RAG and reasoning enhancement methods respectively improve knowledge acquisition and reasoning reliability, and further discuss the integration mechanisms of retrieval and reasoning capabilities in Agentic Systems for mitigating composite hallucinations. By considering the applicability, mitigation mechanisms, and limitations of different approaches, this survey establishes a unified analytical framework connecting hallucination types, key capability dimensions, and technical paradigms.

Abstract:Hallucination remains one of the key obstacles to the reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs). Although various mitigation approaches have been proposed, existing studies often analyze different technical paradigms independently, lacking a unified perspective to understand the underlying mechanisms of different approaches and their correspondence with different types of hallucinations. This survey adopts a capability enhancement perspective to systematically examine hallucination mitigation approaches, focusing on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), reasoning enhancement, and their integration within agentic systems. Based on their primary mitigation mechanisms, we categorize hallucinations into knowledge-based hallucinations and logic-based hallucinations, analyze how RAG and reasoning enhancement methods respectively improve knowledge acquisition and reasoning reliability, and further discuss the integration mechanisms of retrieval and reasoning capabilities in Agentic Systems for mitigating composite hallucinations. By considering the applicability, mitigation mechanisms, and limitations of different approaches, this survey establishes a unified analytical framework connecting hallucination types, key capability dimensions, and technical paradigms.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2510.24476 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2510.24476v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.24476 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage