Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the critical vulnerability of out-of-context misinformation detectors when faced with generative AI-generated evidence, demonstrating that such pollution can degrade detection performance by over 9 percentage points. The authors introduce cross-modal reranking and reasoning strategies to restore robustness in these systems, offering a necessary defense against evolving deceptive content tactics.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Mitigating GenAI-Powered Evidence Pollution for Out-Of-Context Misinformation Detection

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2501.14728v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models have achieved significant success, their misuse for generating deceptive content raises growing concerns about online information security. Out-of-context (OOC) multimodal misinformation detection systems typically rely on Web-retrieved evidence to identify images repurposed in false contexts, but they are increasingly challenged by the presence of GenAI-polluted evidence. Existing work mainly focuses on verifying claims that have undergone stylistic rewriting at the claim level and assume a clean evidence corpus. In this work, we remove this assumption and systematically study the impact of GenAI-driven evidence pollution threat on OOC detection. We show that polluted evidence can degrade the performance of state-of-the-art detectors by more than 9 percentage points. We propose two mitigating strategies, cross-modal evidence reranking and cross-modal claim-evidence reasoning, to address the challenge posed by polluted evidence. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approaches effectively enhance the robustness of existing OOC detectors amidst polluted evidence. The source code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/YanZehong/GenAI-Evidence-Pollution.

Abstract:While generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models have achieved significant success, their misuse for generating deceptive content raises growing concerns about online information security. Out-of-context (OOC) multimodal misinformation detection systems typically rely on Web-retrieved evidence to identify images repurposed in false contexts, but they are increasingly challenged by the presence of GenAI-polluted evidence. Existing work mainly focuses on verifying claims that have undergone stylistic rewriting at the claim level and assume a clean evidence corpus. In this work, we remove this assumption and systematically study the impact of GenAI-driven evidence pollution threat on OOC detection. We show that polluted evidence can degrade the performance of state-of-the-art detectors by more than 9 percentage points. We propose two mitigating strategies, cross-modal evidence reranking and cross-modal claim-evidence reasoning, to address the challenge posed by polluted evidence. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approaches effectively enhance the robustness of existing OOC detectors amidst polluted evidence. The source code and data are publicly available at this https URL.

Multimedia (cs.MM); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

arXiv:2501.14728 [cs.MM]

(or arXiv:2501.14728v2 [cs.MM] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.14728 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words

Related coverage