aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces MissMAC-Bench, a new evaluation framework specifically designed to address the "missing modality issue" in Multimodal Affective Computing (MAC). By enforcing training without missing priors and testing against both fixed and random data gaps, it establishes standardized metrics for model robustness when input modalities are incomplete. This work is critical for advancing reliable AI systems that can function effectively in real-world environments where sensor or data availability is uncertain.
MissMAC-Bench: Building Solid Benchmark for Missing Modality Issue in Robust Multimodal Affective Computing
arXiv:2602.00811v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current Multimodal Affective Computing (MAC) systems heavily rely on the completeness of multiple modalities to accurately understand human's affective state. However, in real-world scenarios, the availability of modality data is often dynamic and uncertain, leading to substantial performance fluctuations due to the distribution shifts and semantic deficiencies of the incomplete multimodal inputs. Known as the missing modality issue, this challenge poses a critical barrier to the robustness and practical deployment of MAC models. To systematically quantify this issue, we introduce \textbf{MissMAC-Bench}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to establish fair and unified evaluation standards from the perspective of cross-modal synergy. Two guiding principles are proposed, including no missing prior during training, and one single model capable of handling both complete and incomplete modality scenarios, thereby ensuring better generalization. Moreover, to bridge the gap between academic research and real-world applications, our benchmark integrates evaluation protocols with both fixed and random missing patterns at the dataset and instance levels. Extensive experiments conducted on 3 widely-used language models across 4 datasets validate the effectiveness of diverse MAC approaches in tackling the missing modality issue. Our benchmark provides a solid foundation for advancing robust MAC and promotes the development of multimedia data mining. Our code is released in https://github.com/RH-Lin/MissMAC-Bench.
Abstract:Current Multimodal Affective Computing (MAC) systems heavily rely on the completeness of multiple modalities to accurately understand human's affective state. However, in real-world scenarios, the availability of modality data is often dynamic and uncertain, leading to substantial performance fluctuations due to the distribution shifts and semantic deficiencies of the incomplete multimodal inputs. Known as the missing modality issue, this challenge poses a critical barrier to the robustness and practical deployment of MAC models. To systematically quantify this issue, we introduce \textbf{MissMAC-Bench}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to establish fair and unified evaluation standards from the perspective of cross-modal synergy. Two guiding principles are proposed, including no missing prior during training, and one single model capable of handling both complete and incomplete modality scenarios, thereby ensuring better generalization. Moreover, to bridge the gap between academic research and real-world applications, our benchmark integrates evaluation protocols with both fixed and random missing patterns at the dataset and instance levels. Extensive experiments conducted on 3 widely-used language models across 4 datasets validate the effectiveness of diverse MAC approaches in tackling the missing modality issue. Our benchmark provides a solid foundation for advancing robust MAC and promotes the development of multimedia data mining. Our code is released in this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2602.00811 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2602.00811v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.00811 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
[AINews] Meta Connect 2026: Muse glasses, voice, video, and Charm
Latent Space · Sep 24, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026