Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper advances the theoretical foundations of optimization by establishing convergence rates for mirror descent algorithms using logarithmic barriers, specifically addressing scenarios where solutions lie on boundaries. By resolving gaps in relative smoothness theory and comparing these methods to interior-point approaches, it offers a rigorous framework for handling divergent Bregman divergences in constrained optimization problems.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Mirror descent algorithms with logarithmic barriers

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.22834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This work derives convergence guarantees for mirror descent and proximal mirror descent algorithms when a logarithmic barrier is used as a distance-generating function. Standard approaches cannot be applied when the solution lies on the boundary, where the Bregman divergence blows up. We show that, in a specific setting, both methods enjoy an $O(\log k / k)$ rate, which is also tight. In addition, our contributions include: (i) a new technique for handling the blow-up; (ii) a resolution of a gap in the theory of relative smoothness; and (iii) a comparison of the proposed approach with interior-point methods.

Abstract:This work derives convergence guarantees for mirror descent and proximal mirror descent algorithms when a logarithmic barrier is used as a distance-generating function. Standard approaches cannot be applied when the solution lies on the boundary, where the Bregman divergence blows up. We show that, in a specific setting, both methods enjoy an $O(\log k / k)$ rate, which is also tight. In addition, our contributions include: (i) a new technique for handling the blow-up; (ii) a resolution of a gap in the theory of relative smoothness; and (iii) a comparison of the proposed approach with interior-point methods.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Numerical Analysis (math.NA)

arXiv:2608.22834 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2608.22834v1 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22834 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 198 words

Related coverage