aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical failure mode in multi-objective alignment where additive rewards cause models to optimize cheap metrics at the expense of others. The proposed Min-Selection Preference Distillation method shifts optimization focus from weighted sums to worst-case objectives, effectively balancing performance across competing goals like emotional support and negotiation without altering standard DPO frameworks. This approach offers a scalable solution for training robust agents that must satisfy diverse constraints simultaneously.
MINT: Min-Selection Preference Distillation for Balanced Multi-Objective Alignment
arXiv:2608.14828v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Aligning a language agent to several objectives at once is a persistent failure mode of preference-based training: when objectives are combined additively, optimization collapses onto whichever is cheapest to improve and sacrifices the rest, so a support agent learns to sound warm while giving no real help. The root issue is that an additive reward has no notion of balance. We introduce Mint (MIN-selection preference disTillation), a one-line change to preference distillation: rather than ranking sampled candidates by a weighted sum of rewards, we rank them by their weakest objective, distilling the best-balanced candidate over the most lopsided one with an unchanged DPO objective. This is the p -> negative infinity limit of a generalized-mean family spanning additive to worst-case selection. Across cooperative emotional support and adversarial negotiation, min-selection lifts both objectives while sharply cutting their imbalance; on emotional support it raises the weaker axis from 0.37 to 0.64 (p < 10^-40), surpassing human experts and persisting across full multi-turn rollouts. A turn-by-turn analysis yields our central finding: min-selection corrects imbalance in proportion to how imbalanced the reference policy is, and its benefit endures over an interaction precisely as long as that imbalance does.
Abstract:Aligning a language agent to several objectives at once is a persistent failure mode of preference-based training: when objectives are combined additively, optimization collapses onto whichever is cheapest to improve and sacrifices the rest, so a support agent learns to sound warm while giving no real help. The root issue is that an additive reward has no notion of balance. We introduce Mint (MIN-selection preference disTillation), a one-line change to preference distillation: rather than ranking sampled candidates by a weighted sum of rewards, we rank them by their weakest objective, distilling the best-balanced candidate over the most lopsided one with an unchanged DPO objective. This is the p -> negative infinity limit of a generalized-mean family spanning additive to worst-case selection. Across cooperative emotional support and adversarial negotiation, min-selection lifts both objectives while sharply cutting their imbalance; on emotional support it raises the weaker axis from 0.37 to 0.64 (p < 10^-40), surpassing human experts and persisting across full multi-turn rollouts. A turn-by-turn analysis yields our central finding: min-selection corrects imbalance in proportion to how imbalanced the reference policy is, and its benefit endures over an interaction precisely as long as that imbalance does.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.14828 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.14828v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14828 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
Introducing Instella-MoE: A State-of-the-Art Fully Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Model
AMD · Jul 24, 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · Sep 27, 2026
Amazon is investing in the Lean Focused Research Organization
Amazon Science · Jul 26, 2026