aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes minimax-optimal regret rates for repeated contract design where the principal learns agent responses from observed outcomes without direct action visibility. By leveraging effective-dimension reduction and Lipschitz parametrization, the authors derive tight bounds that hold even with discontinuous profit functions and arbitrary action spaces. The work provides a theoretical foundation for understanding how incentive compatibility constraints fundamentally limit learning efficiency in multi-outcome environments.
Minimax-Optimal Online Contract Design with Unrestricted Bounded Contracts
arXiv:2609.20353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study repeated contract design when a principal observes outcomes but not the actions that generate them. The principal may use any bounded outcome-contingent payment vector, and the agent's best response can make expected profit discontinuous in those payments. For every fixed number $m\ge2$ of outcomes, the minimax regret over $T$ rounds is of order $T^{m/(m+1)}$, up to logarithmic factors. The upper bound allows arbitrary action spaces and agent heterogeneity, without smoothness or monotone-surplus assumptions. Its key is an effective-dimension reduction that the benchmark can be normalized even when fixed tie-breaking is not shift invariant, after which revealed preference yields a monotone response map in payment-difference coordinates. A learning policy built on a Lipschitz parametrization of this map attains the rate using only observed outcome categories. The lower-bound construction accounts for how incentive losses accumulate across outcome dimensions. It shows that each additional contractible outcome creates a precise and unavoidable increase in the worst-case cost of learning.
Abstract:We study repeated contract design when a principal observes outcomes but not the actions that generate them. The principal may use any bounded outcome-contingent payment vector, and the agent's best response can make expected profit discontinuous in those payments. For every fixed number $m\ge2$ of outcomes, the minimax regret over $T$ rounds is of order $T^{m/(m+1)}$, up to logarithmic factors. The upper bound allows arbitrary action spaces and agent heterogeneity, without smoothness or monotone-surplus assumptions. Its key is an effective-dimension reduction that the benchmark can be normalized even when fixed tie-breaking is not shift invariant, after which revealed preference yields a monotone response map in payment-difference coordinates. A learning policy built on a Lipschitz parametrization of this map attains the rate using only observed outcome categories. The lower-bound construction accounts for how incentive losses accumulate across outcome dimensions. It shows that each additional contractible outcome creates a precise and unavoidable increase in the worst-case cost of learning.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.20353 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.20353v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20353 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words
Related coverage
Regret Minimization for Piecewise Linear Rewards: Contracts, Auctions, and Beyond
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026
Online Algorithms via Minimax and Posterior Matching
arXiv · Aug 4, 2026
A Geometric Approach to Constrained Online Learning
arXiv · Jul 23, 2026
Minimax Alternating Regret for the Experts Problem and Online Convex Optimization
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026