aiqbench analysis
This research establishes the theoretical lower bounds for memory required in imitation learning under partial observability, proving that minimal recurrent behavioral memory can be characterized by specific compatibility relations. The study demonstrates that learned code rates remain efficient even as hidden state complexity grows to 512 modes, offering a rigorous information-theoretic framework for robotics and reinforcement learning systems.
Minimal Recurrent Behavioral Memory for Imitation under Partial Observability
arXiv:2609.25757v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What is the least recurrent memory needed to reproduce a specified expert under partial observability? The instantaneous requirement is the conditional entropy of the expert's behavioral quotient, but recurrence must also preserve distinctions that future observations will not restore before use. We characterize this minimal recurrent behavioral memory by a compatibility relation: under transitivity its classes attain the exact minimum, while the general case is an entropy minimization over closed compatible state assignments, with exact certificates on finite instances. A sole-carrier measurement protocol separates behavioral sufficiency, excess code rate, and information carried by observations or other memory paths; experimental bit requirements refer to the induced symbolic behavioral model under the stated occupancy. Across manipulation tasks, learned code rates remain near zero- and two-bit requirements as hidden modes grow to $512$, and anticipatory memory follows a $2\to1\to0$ requirement despite zero instantaneous demand during waiting. Learning this representation remains difficult: event-agnostic future-behavior supervision yields $36/40$ sufficient seeds with one frozen configuration and improves the longest-horizon pixel setting from $0/8$ to $6/8$ sufficient held-out seeds (closed-loop success from $0.08$ to $0.57$). On unmodified community benchmarks, the protocol certifies delay-independent requirements, which sufficient codes match at mid-delay. The supervision aids commitment but can induce predictive surplus; annealing it lets imitation and rate training reduce that surplus, separating the information-theoretic target from the ability to learn it.
Abstract:What is the least recurrent memory needed to reproduce a specified expert under partial observability? The instantaneous requirement is the conditional entropy of the expert's behavioral quotient, but recurrence must also preserve distinctions that future observations will not restore before use. We characterize this minimal recurrent behavioral memory by a compatibility relation: under transitivity its classes attain the exact minimum, while the general case is an entropy minimization over closed compatible state assignments, with exact certificates on finite instances. A sole-carrier measurement protocol separates behavioral sufficiency, excess code rate, and information carried by observations or other memory paths; experimental bit requirements refer to the induced symbolic behavioral model under the stated occupancy. Across manipulation tasks, learned code rates remain near zero- and two-bit requirements as hidden modes grow to $512$, and anticipatory memory follows a $2\to1\to0$ requirement despite zero instantaneous demand during waiting. Learning this representation remains difficult: event-agnostic future-behavior supervision yields $36/40$ sufficient seeds with one frozen configuration and improves the longest-horizon pixel setting from $0/8$ to $6/8$ sufficient held-out seeds (closed-loop success from $0.08$ to $0.57$). On unmodified community benchmarks, the protocol certifies delay-independent requirements, which sufficient codes match at mid-delay. The supervision aids commitment but can induce predictive surplus; annealing it lets imitation and rate training reduce that surplus, separating the information-theoretic target from the ability to learn it.
46 pages, 10 figures. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Information Theory (cs.IT); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2609.25757 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.25757v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25757 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 329 words
Related coverage
SRMT: Shared Memory for Multi-agent Lifelong Pathfinding
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026

Ergodicity broken in quantum systems even after long evolution
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 11, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026
$\mu$VLA: On Recurrent Memory for Partially Observable Manipulation in VLA Models
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026