aiqbench analysis
This research investigates how large learning rates alter neural network optimization trajectories by introducing a new metric called "Drift," which complements the existing concept of Gain. The study demonstrates that these aggressive learning rates do not inherently prevent sparse solutions but can instead be leveraged to control implicit biases during early training phases. By actively steering the Gain, practitioners can recover sharper interpolators in regression tasks, offering a refined theoretical lens for understanding dynamics at the Edge of Stability.
Mind the Drift: Diagonal Linear Networks Under Large Learning Rates
arXiv:2610.06120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large learning rates can qualitatively change the trajectory of neural network training, often pushing optimization into regimes far from classical gradient-flow behavior. The Edge of Stability (EoS) offers a valuable lens on the dynamics such learning rates induce. We study corresponding dynamics in diagonal linear networks, where we uncover a competition between two distinct implicit biases that jointly determine the sparsity of the recovered solution in regression settings. Complementary to the Gain, which captures the average discretization error accumulated by Gradient Descent relative to Gradient Flow, we derive a closely associated but overlooked quantity: the Drift. Under large learning rates, it describes an imbalance between different discretization errors and represents a systematic shift in the optimization trajectory. While the Gain grows monotonically in certain regimes, and can bias towards denser, flatter interpolators, the impact of the Drift depends on its alignment with potential solutions, which can either counteract or reinforce the effect of the Gain. Consequently, its behavior drives model selection, particularly during early training epochs. To validate our theoretical insights, we introduce an intervention that actively steers the Gain to recover sharper, sparser solutions. Thus, our analysis reveals that large learning rates do not universally hinder the recovery of sparse solutions. On the contrary, they can be harnessed to control the implicit bias of training.
Abstract:Large learning rates can qualitatively change the trajectory of neural network training, often pushing optimization into regimes far from classical gradient-flow behavior. The Edge of Stability (EoS) offers a valuable lens on the dynamics such learning rates induce. We study corresponding dynamics in diagonal linear networks, where we uncover a competition between two distinct implicit biases that jointly determine the sparsity of the recovered solution in regression settings. Complementary to the Gain, which captures the average discretization error accumulated by Gradient Descent relative to Gradient Flow, we derive a closely associated but overlooked quantity: the Drift. Under large learning rates, it describes an imbalance between different discretization errors and represents a systematic shift in the optimization trajectory. While the Gain grows monotonically in certain regimes, and can bias towards denser, flatter interpolators, the impact of the Drift depends on its alignment with potential solutions, which can either counteract or reinforce the effect of the Gain. Consequently, its behavior drives model selection, particularly during early training epochs. To validate our theoretical insights, we introduce an intervention that actively steers the Gain to recover sharper, sparser solutions. Thus, our analysis reveals that large learning rates do not universally hinder the recovery of sparse solutions. On the contrary, they can be harnessed to control the implicit bias of training.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.06120 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.06120v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06120 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

How do neural networks regress cubic polynomials? Apparently, they use a trick invented in Milan 500 years ago
LessWrong · Jul 22, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026