Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces MGSM-Pro, a robust benchmark addressing critical gaps in multilingual mathematical reasoning evaluation across nine languages. The study reveals significant performance drops in low-resource languages when models encounter digit variations and notes that proprietary models like Gemini 3.0 Pro demonstrate superior robustness compared to earlier versions or open-source alternatives. Researchers should adopt the recommended strategy of using multiple digit-instantiated problem versions to ensure realistic assessments of model capabilities beyond English-centric datasets.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

MGSM-Pro: A Simple Strategy for Robust Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning Evaluation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.21225v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models have made substantial progress in mathematical reasoning. However, benchmark development for multilingual evaluation has lagged behind English in both difficulty and recency. Recently, GSM-Symbolic showed a strong evidence of high variance when models are evaluated on different instantiations of the same question; however, the evaluation was conducted only in English. In this paper, we introduce MGSM-Pro, an extension of MGSM dataset with GSM-Symbolic approach. Our dataset provides five instantiations per MGSM question by varying names, digits and irrelevant context. Evaluations across nine languages reveal that many low-resource languages suffer large performance drops when tested on digit instantiations different from those in the original test set. We further find that models robustness in HRL setting do not necessarily translate to LRL. Moreover, proprietary models, such as Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-4.1 are less robust to digit, whereas Gemini 3.0 Pro is more robust. Among open models, GPT-OSS 120B and DeepSeek v3 show stronger robustness. Based on these findings, we recommend evaluating each problem using at least five digit-varying instantiations to obtain a more robust and realistic assessment of math reasoning.

Abstract:Large language models have made substantial progress in mathematical reasoning. However, benchmark development for multilingual evaluation has lagged behind English in both difficulty and recency. Recently, GSM-Symbolic showed a strong evidence of high variance when models are evaluated on different instantiations of the same question; however, the evaluation was conducted only in English. In this paper, we introduce MGSM-Pro, an extension of MGSM dataset with GSM-Symbolic approach. Our dataset provides five instantiations per MGSM question by varying names, digits and irrelevant context. Evaluations across nine languages reveal that many low-resource languages suffer large performance drops when tested on digit instantiations different from those in the original test set. We further find that models robustness in HRL setting do not necessarily translate to LRL. Moreover, proprietary models, such as Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-4.1 are less robust to digit, whereas Gemini 3.0 Pro is more robust. Among open models, GPT-OSS 120B and DeepSeek v3 show stronger robustness. Based on these findings, we recommend evaluating each problem using at least five digit-varying instantiations to obtain a more robust and realistic assessment of math reasoning.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2601.21225 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2601.21225v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.21225 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage