Skip to content
aiqbench takeWritten by an AI model; may contain errors — check the source.AI Research

aiqbench analysis

The paper proposes an automated method for tuning the scaffolding around LLM agents that detect vulnerabilities, rather than hand-writing it. Its reported gains (up to 25.8 points on a held-out set) come from paired vulnerable and patched functions, so readers should check how well the benchmark reflects real-world detection. The transfer results across models are the most relevant signal for teams building LLM-based security tooling.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Computing Report
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

MetaVul: Agentic Harness Discovery for Vulnerability Detection

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.40721v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly used to automate vulnerability detection, but reliable detection is challenging because agents must distinguish subtle, security-relevant fixes from benign code variation. While underlying LLM capability has improved significantly, the accuracy of the agent still depends heavily on the harness: the code that defines the scaffolding around the LLM. Harnesses are typically fixed, and largely hand-written, limiting adaptation to evaluator feedback. Additionally, when harnesses are static, improvements on one dataset or model may not transfer to others. To address these challenges, we introduce MetaVul, a self-improving framework for harness discovery in vulnerability detection. Starting from a seed structured reasoning scaffold, MetaVul uses a workflow-based optimization loop to iteratively refine the harness using feedback from paired vulnerable and patched functions, while preserving the structured reasoning and verdict format. At each iteration, it searches over the history of prior harnesses, with access to their trajectories, logs, and metrics, and it returns a set of Pareto-optimal harnesses. We apply MetaVul to discover agent harnesses for various architectures. A validation set (202 pairs) is used for optimization, while an unseen dataset (430 pairs) is kept as the held-out set. We test whether harnesses learned from one model transfer to others not seen during optimization. Results on both frontier and small LLMs show that the optimized harnesses improve pairwise vulnerability detection up to 23.3 percentage points on the validation set and up to 25.8 points on the held-out set with a Pareto-frontier harness. Harnesses learned with one model also transfer to others. We show that harnesses optimized with one model transfer to another, improving held-out pairwise accuracy by 14.7 points without further optimization.

Abstract:LLM agents are increasingly used to automate vulnerability detection, but reliable detection is challenging because agents must distinguish subtle, security-relevant fixes from benign code variation. While underlying LLM capability has improved significantly, the accuracy of the agent still depends heavily on the harness: the code that defines the scaffolding around the LLM. Harnesses are typically fixed, and largely hand-written, limiting adaptation to evaluator feedback. Additionally, when harnesses are static, improvements on one dataset or model may not transfer to others. To address these challenges, we introduce MetaVul, a self-improving framework for harness discovery in vulnerability detection. Starting from a seed structured reasoning scaffold, MetaVul uses a workflow-based optimization loop to iteratively refine the harness using feedback from paired vulnerable and patched functions, while preserving the structured reasoning and verdict format. At each iteration, it searches over the history of prior harnesses, with access to their trajectories, logs, and metrics, and it returns a set of Pareto-optimal harnesses. We apply MetaVul to discover agent harnesses for various architectures. A validation set (202 pairs) is used for optimization, while an unseen dataset (430 pairs) is kept as the held-out set. We test whether harnesses learned from one model transfer to others not seen during optimization. Results on both frontier and small LLMs show that the optimized harnesses improve pairwise vulnerability detection up to 23.3 percentage points on the validation set and up to 25.8 points on the held-out set with a Pareto-frontier harness. Harnesses learned with one model also transfer to others. We show that harnesses optimized with one model transfer to another, improving held-out pairwise accuracy by 14.7 points without further optimization.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2610.40721 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2610.40721v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40721 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 372 words

Related coverage