aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a metamorphic testing framework to evaluate the faithfulness of post-hoc explanations like SHAP and LIME without relying on ground-truth labels. By formalizing consistency properties between model behavior and feature attributions, the method addresses the "Rashomon effect" where equivalent models yield divergent explanations. The approach offers a practical, model-agnostic tool for validating explanation reliability in critical machine learning applications.
Metamorphic Testing with the Rashomon Set: Explanation Faithfulness in Machine Learning
arXiv:2606.06056v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multiple machine learning models can achieve near-equivalent predictive performance on the same task, yet provide divergent feature-based explanations. This is called the Rashomon effect of (explainable) machine learning, and it raises the question of which explanations, if any, are trustworthy. We propose a framework based on metamorphic testing that assesses explanation faithfulness without requiring ground-truth labels by exploring attributed feature importance from post-hoc explanation methods. Five metamorphic relations formalize expected consistency properties between model behavior and feature attributions. We apply this general framework to two tabular regression datasets and two post-hoc explainers (SHAP and LIME) to demonstrate the approach. The framework offers a practical, model-agnostic tool for selecting accurate models with reliable and trustworthy explanations.
Abstract:Multiple machine learning models can achieve near-equivalent predictive performance on the same task, yet provide divergent feature-based explanations. This is called the Rashomon effect of (explainable) machine learning, and it raises the question of which explanations, if any, are trustworthy. We propose a framework based on metamorphic testing that assesses explanation faithfulness without requiring ground-truth labels by exploring attributed feature importance from post-hoc explanation methods. Five metamorphic relations formalize expected consistency properties between model behavior and feature attributions. We apply this general framework to two tabular regression datasets and two post-hoc explainers (SHAP and LIME) to demonstrate the approach. The framework offers a practical, model-agnostic tool for selecting accurate models with reliable and trustworthy explanations.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.06056 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2606.06056v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06056 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words
Related coverage

Drivers predict self-driving car actions better with AI insights
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 2, 2026

System helps humans predict when self-driving cars will make mistakes
MIT News · Sep 2, 2026
Does Explainability Survive Data Drift?
arXiv · Oct 7, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026