Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Meta employees ordered ‘attorney/client privilege’ hats while fighting child safety disclosures

Meta's lawyers have argued that certain evidence should be withheld from public view on the grounds of attorney-client privilege in the ongoing lawsuits over alleged harm to teens' safety and mental health. Lawyers suing the company said this week that the label has been applied far too broadly, while pointing to a recently unsealed document showing that the team behind launching Instagram's Teen Accounts in 2024 put in an order for baseball caps that simply said "a/c priv." The lawyers suing Meta argue the Project Nido (an internal name for the Teen Accounts team) swag is part of "culture of privilege abuse at Meta" aimed at keeping the re … Read the full story at The Verge.
Lawyers suing Meta called the hats an example of its ‘culture of privilege abuse.’ Lawyers suing Meta called the hats an example of its ‘culture of privilege abuse.’ is a senior editor following news across…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 35 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage

Sen. Adam Schiff on AI regulation, free speech, and impeaching Trump one more time
The Verge · Oct 5, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Inside the suddenly explosive world of AI safety
The Verge · Sep 17, 2026

Presentation: Enchant Your AI and APIs with eBPF Magic 🪄
InfoQ · Aug 21, 2026