aiqbench analysis
The paper studies a specific failure mode in LLM agents with long-term memory: when the same historical claim is retrieved and written back repeatedly, it can dominate current answers without new evidence. It introduces MEchoBench and a provenance-based mitigation (FPA), and reports accuracy gains on 190 fixed questions across two models and four memory frameworks. These are single-preprint results on a modest question set, so readers should check how well the gains transfer before treating the mitigation as general.
Memory Echo in Single-Agent Long-Term Memory: Lifecycle Evaluation and Provenance-Guided Mitigation
arXiv:2610.17763v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory supports agents across sessions. Repeated retrieval and write-back can let one historical claim occupy multiple retrieval positions and influence current answers without independent evidence. Existing work examines retrieval, updating, and question answering, leaving same-source record accumulation and post-correction persistence underexplored. Motivated by research in social cognition and memory psychology on repeated exposure, retrieval, and revision, we define \emph{Memory Echo} as the excess retrieval exposure gained by historical information from the same source without additional independent evidence, and introduce MEchoBench to evaluate its emergence, correction resistance, persistence, and effect on answers. To address this phenomenon, we introduce the Family--Provenance--Authority framework (FPA). Specifically, FPA selects one representative per source family, conditions the eligibility of old records for the answer context on verified corrections, and constrains final answers with authoritative evidence. In paired replay on 190 fixed questions across four memory frameworks, FPA raises accuracy from 0.825 to 0.920 with DeepSeek V4 Flash and from 0.782 to 0.916 with Kimi K2.6; mean Decision Contamination Effect falls from 0.106 to 0.030 and from 0.109 to 0.038, respectively. These results show that agent memory can preserve traceable history without allowing repeated historical information to govern current decisions. The code is available at https://github.com/OrcasSam/memory-echo-benchmark.
Abstract:Long-term memory supports agents across sessions. Repeated retrieval and write-back can let one historical claim occupy multiple retrieval positions and influence current answers without independent evidence. Existing work examines retrieval, updating, and question answering, leaving same-source record accumulation and post-correction persistence underexplored. Motivated by research in social cognition and memory psychology on repeated exposure, retrieval, and revision, we define \emph{Memory Echo} as the excess retrieval exposure gained by historical information from the same source without additional independent evidence, and introduce MEchoBench to evaluate its emergence, correction resistance, persistence, and effect on answers. To address this phenomenon, we introduce the Family--Provenance--Authority framework (FPA). Specifically, FPA selects one representative per source family, conditions the eligibility of old records for the answer context on verified corrections, and constrains final answers with authoritative evidence. In paired replay on 190 fixed questions across four memory frameworks, FPA raises accuracy from 0.825 to 0.920 with DeepSeek V4 Flash and from 0.782 to 0.916 with Kimi K2.6; mean Decision Contamination Effect falls from 0.106 to 0.030 and from 0.109 to 0.038, respectively. These results show that agent memory can preserve traceable history without allowing repeated historical information to govern current decisions. The code is available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.17763 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.17763v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17763 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage

Designing lifecycle policies for AgentCore memory
AWS · Sep 4, 2026

How Cornerstone OnDemand cut database diagnosis by 78% with Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Oct 7, 2026

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · Oct 8, 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026