aiqbench analysis
The paper introduces PraxisMemBench, a benchmark for persistent personal assistants that tests whether memory about the user and memory about procedures can be maintained together over time. Its reported results (completion falling from 84.6% to 77.9% when the two memory types are interdependent, and relation-related failures rising from 59.8% to 72.9% in later sessions) point to continual memory maintenance as an open problem, not just memory writing. Readers should treat the PraxisMem gains (40.78% vs. 20.60% Session Success Rate against Claude Code's native memory) as benchmark-specific results that need independent replication.
Memorizing Who, Knowing How: Benchmarking Personal and Procedural Memory for Persistent Assistants
arXiv:2610.20022v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory systems for persistent personal agents must move beyond isolated memories, maintaining both personal memory about whom they serve and procedural memory about how to act. Crucially, in harness-based personal assistance, procedures or skills are inherently user-conditioned: personal context determines which procedures apply, how they are instantiated, and when they should change. Existing benchmarks typically emphasize either personal or procedural memory, leaving their interaction underexplored. We introduce PraxisMemBench, a harness-based benchmark for persistent personal assistance across daily-life and work trajectories, where personal and procedural memory evolve together and later tasks depend on both. Experiments show that maintaining two memory types separately is insufficient, with completion dropping from single-type to interdependent dependencies (84.6% to 77.9%). More broadly, across existing methods, relation-related failures increase from early to late sessions as interaction history grows (59.8% to 72.9%), revealing a continual-maintenance challenge: writing correct memories is not enough if their evolving content and organization cannot be preserved for later retrieval. To address this, we propose PraxisMem, which uses privileged joint-state supervision to internalize the ability to maintain memory content and organization into the memory manager, with location-aware GRPO and dynamic residual-routed OPSD. PraxisMem reaches 40.78% overall Session Success Rate, compared with 20.60% for Claude Code's native memory.
Abstract:Memory systems for persistent personal agents must move beyond isolated memories, maintaining both personal memory about whom they serve and procedural memory about how to act. Crucially, in harness-based personal assistance, procedures or skills are inherently user-conditioned: personal context determines which procedures apply, how they are instantiated, and when they should change. Existing benchmarks typically emphasize either personal or procedural memory, leaving their interaction underexplored. We introduce PraxisMemBench, a harness-based benchmark for persistent personal assistance across daily-life and work trajectories, where personal and procedural memory evolve together and later tasks depend on both. Experiments show that maintaining two memory types separately is insufficient, with completion dropping from single-type to interdependent dependencies (84.6% to 77.9%). More broadly, across existing methods, relation-related failures increase from early to late sessions as interaction history grows (59.8% to 72.9%), revealing a continual-maintenance challenge: writing correct memories is not enough if their evolving content and organization cannot be preserved for later retrieval. To address this, we propose PraxisMem, which uses privileged joint-state supervision to internalize the ability to maintain memory content and organization into the memory manager, with location-aware GRPO and dynamic residual-routed OPSD. PraxisMem reaches 40.78% overall Session Success Rate, compared with 20.60% for Claude Code's native memory.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.20022 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.20022v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20022 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026

A Candid Abacus AI Review: The All-in-One AI Platform for Professionals & Enterprises
KDnuggets · Sep 10, 2026

Presentation: The Agent Harness: Control Planes, Invariants, and Approval Boundaries for Production AI Agents
InfoQ · Sep 21, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026