aiqbench analysis
MedRECT introduces a critical bilingual benchmark for evaluating large language models on detecting and correcting errors in Japanese and English clinical texts, addressing a significant gap beyond English-only evaluation. The study reveals that general-purpose reasoning models often outperform specialized medical models on error detection and extraction, while demonstrating that enabling "thinking" modes and applying LoRA fine-tuning can substantially improve correction accuracy. This resource provides an essential dataset for researchers aiming to advance the reliability and safety of AI systems in high-stakes healthcare environments across different languages.
MedRECT: A Bilingual Medical Reasoning Benchmark for Error Correction in Clinical Texts
arXiv:2511.00421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise in medical applications, but their ability to detect and correct errors in clinical texts remains under-evaluated, particularly beyond English. We introduce MedRECT, a bilingual benchmark for Japanese and English that formulates medical error handling as three subtasks: error detection, error sentence extraction, and error correction. MedRECT-ja contains 663 samples derived from the Japanese Medical Licensing Examinations, while the separately sourced MedRECT-en contains 458 samples curated from MEDEC. We evaluate 11 LLMs across 17 configurations that cover proprietary and open-weight models, medical-domain specialization, and multiple reasoning settings. Qwen3-32B scores higher in its thinking mode than in its non-thinking mode on error detection F1 and sentence extraction accuracy in both subsets, with sentence extraction accuracy higher by 24.5 percentage points on MedRECT-ja and 10.3 on MedRECT-en. Several leading general-purpose reasoning models outperform all three evaluated medical-domain models on these two subtasks. Most models have lower point estimates on the Japanese subset, although absolute scores are not directly comparable because the subsets differ in source material and error distributions. LoRA fine-tuning yields higher sentence extraction accuracy and higher point estimates on all three reference-based correction similarity metrics in both languages. MedRECT provides an open, reusable evaluation resource for studying medical error correction and reasoning across Japanese and English. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/pfnet-research/medrect.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) show promise in medical applications, but their ability to detect and correct errors in clinical texts remains under-evaluated, particularly beyond English. We introduce MedRECT, a bilingual benchmark for Japanese and English that formulates medical error handling as three subtasks: error detection, error sentence extraction, and error correction. MedRECT-ja contains 663 samples derived from the Japanese Medical Licensing Examinations, while the separately sourced MedRECT-en contains 458 samples curated from MEDEC. We evaluate 11 LLMs across 17 configurations that cover proprietary and open-weight models, medical-domain specialization, and multiple reasoning settings. Qwen3-32B scores higher in its thinking mode than in its non-thinking mode on error detection F1 and sentence extraction accuracy in both subsets, with sentence extraction accuracy higher by 24.5 percentage points on MedRECT-ja and 10.3 on MedRECT-en. Several leading general-purpose reasoning models outperform all three evaluated medical-domain models on these two subtasks. Most models have lower point estimates on the Japanese subset, although absolute scores are not directly comparable because the subsets differ in source material and error distributions. LoRA fine-tuning yields higher sentence extraction accuracy and higher point estimates on all three reference-based correction similarity metrics in both languages. MedRECT provides an open, reusable evaluation resource for studying medical error correction and reasoning across Japanese and English. Our dataset and code are available at this https URL.
16 pages. To appear at the EMNLP 2026 Workshop on Open Reasoning Across Cultures & Languages (ORACLE)
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2511.00421 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2511.00421v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.00421 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
Related coverage

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 2, 2026
Enabling a new model for healthcare with AI co-clinician
Google DeepMind · Apr 30, 2026
Evaluating Multi-Turn Multimodal Diagnostic Reasoning on Challenging Real-World Clinical Cases
arXiv · Jul 29, 2026

How Guardoc transforms medical document processing with Amazon Nova models
AWS · Jul 27, 2026