aiqbench analysis
This research advances mechanistic interpretability by demonstrating that LLMs encode cognitive complexity hierarchically within linearly accessible subspaces of their activation vectors. The study provides empirical evidence using Bloom's Taxonomy, showing that models resolve prompt difficulty early in the forward pass with high accuracy via simple classifiers. Such insights are crucial for understanding how internal representations map to abstract reasoning capabilities beyond surface-level performance metrics.
Mechanistic Interpretability of Cognitive Complexity in LLMs via Linear Probing using Bloom's Taxonomy
arXiv:2602.17229v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The black-box nature of Large Language Models necessitates novel evaluation frameworks that transcend surface-level performance metrics. This study investigates the internal neural representations of cognitive complexity using Bloom's Taxonomy as a hierarchical lens. By analyzing high-dimensional activation vectors from different LLMs, we probe whether different cognitive levels, ranging from basic recall (Remember) to abstract synthesis (Create), are linearly separable within the model's residual streams. Our results demonstrate that linear classifiers achieve approximately 95% mean accuracy across all Bloom levels, providing strong evidence that cognitive level is encoded in a linearly accessible subspace of the model's representations. These findings provide evidence that the model resolves the cognitive difficulty of a prompt early in the forward pass, with representations becoming increasingly separable across layers.
Abstract:The black-box nature of Large Language Models necessitates novel evaluation frameworks that transcend surface-level performance metrics. This study investigates the internal neural representations of cognitive complexity using Bloom's Taxonomy as a hierarchical lens. By analyzing high-dimensional activation vectors from different LLMs, we probe whether different cognitive levels, ranging from basic recall (Remember) to abstract synthesis (Create), are linearly separable within the model's residual streams. Our results demonstrate that linear classifiers achieve approximately 95% mean accuracy across all Bloom levels, providing strong evidence that cognitive level is encoded in a linearly accessible subspace of the model's representations. These findings provide evidence that the model resolves the cognitive difficulty of a prompt early in the forward pass, with representations becoming increasingly separable across layers.
Preprint. Under review
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2602.17229 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2602.17229v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.17229 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

"I am an AI Safety Researcher"
LessWrong · Sep 23, 2026
VFUSE: Virulent Feature Understanding With Sparse AutoEncoders
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026
How to Open Them Up – Part I
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026