Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study utilizes large language models to quantify narrative polarization within partisan information environments regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, distinguishing between video content and comment sections. By formalizing how narratives shape opinions independent of direct human interaction, the research offers a methodological advance for analyzing societal impacts through AI-driven discourse analysis.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Measuring Narrative Polarization in Online Discourse

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.07398v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Polarization research has demonstrated how people cluster in homogeneous groups with opposing opinions. However, this effect emerges not only through interaction between people, limiting communication between groups, but also between narratives, shaping opinions and partisan identities. Yet, how polarized information environments portray opposing interpretations of reality, and whether narratives move between content environments despite limited interactions, remains unexplored. To address this gap, we formalize the concept of narrative polarization and demonstrate its measurement in 212 YouTube videos and 90,029 comments on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Based on structural narrative theory and implemented through a large language model, we extract the narrative roles assigned to central actors in two partisan information environments. We find that while videos produce highly polarized narratives, comments exhibit significantly lower levels of narrative polarization, converging on shared core narrative structures. However, recurring narrative motifs capturing more complex actor constellations reveal additional differences between partisan environments.

Abstract:Polarization research has demonstrated how people cluster in homogeneous groups with opposing opinions. However, this effect emerges not only through interaction between people, limiting communication between groups, but also between narratives, shaping opinions and partisan identities. Yet, how polarized information environments portray opposing interpretations of reality, and whether narratives move between content environments despite limited interactions, remains unexplored. To address this gap, we formalize the concept of narrative polarization and demonstrate its measurement in 212 YouTube videos and 90,029 comments on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Based on structural narrative theory and implemented through a large language model, we extract the narrative roles assigned to central actors in two partisan information environments. We find that while videos produce highly polarized narratives, comments exhibit significantly lower levels of narrative polarization, converging on shared core narrative structures. However, recurring narrative motifs capturing more complex actor constellations reveal additional differences between partisan environments.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)

arXiv:2601.07398 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2601.07398v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.07398 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag270 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 260 words

Related coverage