Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study investigates the efficacy of adding low-resource languages like Greek to robot foundation models using only machine-rephrased instructions without architectural changes. The research highlights critical measurement pitfalls, such as unreliable metrics and seed variation, while demonstrating that bilingual training achieves roughly 40% of English performance but significantly outperforms single-language baselines. These findings underscore the necessity for rigorous null hypothesis testing and multi-seed replication when evaluating language transfer in robotic policies.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Measuring Language Transfer in Robot Policies: Adding Greek to a Cosmos3 Vision-Language-Action Policy

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.07470v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robot foundation models are trained and evaluated predominantly in English, and robot demonstration corpora do not exist for most languages. We study the addition of Greek to an open vision-language-action stack using only machine-rephrased instructions and no architecture changes. The main challenge is measurement rather than translation. Several plausible instruments produce false conclusions: a color-histogram metric rewards noise, a single-goal benchmark scores 84.6% under correct Greek and 82.6% under deliberately wrong instructions, training loss fails to predict Greek success, and single-run comparisons are dominated by seed variation. On a discriminative ninety-task suite with three seeds per arm, a multilingual text tower without Greek demonstrations remains at its wrong-instruction floor, while Greek-only training exceeds its control by at most 2.7 points. Bilingual training yields a consistent 6.7-7.1 point margin over its control and reaches about two fifths of English performance. The policy also overfits the translator's phrasing; training on seven phrasings per task approximately halves this penalty. Warm-starting from a language-adapted world model and unfreezing the text tower both degrade performance. The results support two practical requirements for low-resource robot-policy localization: build a guaranteed null before trusting a metric, and replicate low-resource-language results across seeds.

Abstract:Robot foundation models are trained and evaluated predominantly in English, and robot demonstration corpora do not exist for most languages. We study the addition of Greek to an open vision-language-action stack using only machine-rephrased instructions and no architecture changes. The main challenge is measurement rather than translation. Several plausible instruments produce false conclusions: a color-histogram metric rewards noise, a single-goal benchmark scores 84.6% under correct Greek and 82.6% under deliberately wrong instructions, training loss fails to predict Greek success, and single-run comparisons are dominated by seed variation. On a discriminative ninety-task suite with three seeds per arm, a multilingual text tower without Greek demonstrations remains at its wrong-instruction floor, while Greek-only training exceeds its control by at most 2.7 points. Bilingual training yields a consistent 6.7-7.1 point margin over its control and reaches about two fifths of English performance. The policy also overfits the translator's phrasing; training on seven phrasings per task approximately halves this penalty. Warm-starting from a language-adapted world model and unfreezing the text tower both degrade performance. The results support two practical requirements for low-resource robot-policy localization: build a guaranteed null before trusting a metric, and replicate low-resource-language results across seeds.

22 pages, 16 figures, 6 tables. Model and reproduction information: this https URL

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.07470 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.07470v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07470 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words

Related coverage