Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research proposes an information-theoretic framework to quantify the proportional contribution of humans versus AI in generative content, addressing critical challenges regarding originality attribution. By calculating mutual information between human inputs and model outputs, the study provides a measurable metric for distinguishing varying degrees of human agency across creative domains. This work establishes a foundational methodology for evaluating authorship and responsibility in the era of widespread generative AI adoption.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2408.14792v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the growing prevalence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.

Abstract:With the growing prevalence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2408.14792 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2408.14792v4 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.14792 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage