aiqbench analysis
This research extends matrix product state techniques to simulate lossy boson sampling and noisy IQP circuits, refining the boundary where quantum advantage remains secure against physical noise. By establishing tunable accuracy-efficiency trade-offs for various input states like cat-states, the work provides a scalable classical benchmark essential for validating future quantum hardware claims.
Matrix product state approach to lossy boson sampling and noisy IQP sampling
arXiv:2510.24137v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sampling problems have emerged as a central avenue for demonstrating quantum advantage on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. However, physical noise can fundamentally alter their computational complexity, often making them classically tractable. Motivated by the recent success of matrix product state (MPS)-based classical simulation of Gaussian boson sampling (Oh et al., 2024), we extend this framework to investigate the classical simulability of other noisy quantum sampling models. We develop MPS-based classical algorithms for lossy boson sampling and noisy instantaneous quantum polynomial-time (IQP) sampling, both of which retain the tunable accuracy characteristic of the MPS approach through the bond dimension. Our approach constructs pure-state decompositions of noisy or lossy input states whose components remain weakly entangled after circuit evolution, thereby providing a means to systematically explore the boundary between quantum-hard and classically-simulable regimes. For boson sampling, we analyze single-photon, Fock, and cat-state inputs, showing that classical simulability emerges at transmission rates scaling as $O(1/\sqrt{N})$, reaching the known boundary of quantum advantage with a tunable and scalable method. Beyond reproducing previous thresholds, our algorithm offers significantly improved control over the accuracy-efficiency trade-off. It further extends the applicability of MPS-based simulation to broader classes of noisy quantum sampling models, including IQP circuits.
Abstract:Sampling problems have emerged as a central avenue for demonstrating quantum advantage on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. However, physical noise can fundamentally alter their computational complexity, often making them classically tractable. Motivated by the recent success of matrix product state (MPS)-based classical simulation of Gaussian boson sampling (Oh et al., 2024), we extend this framework to investigate the classical simulability of other noisy quantum sampling models. We develop MPS-based classical algorithms for lossy boson sampling and noisy instantaneous quantum polynomial-time (IQP) sampling, both of which retain the tunable accuracy characteristic of the MPS approach through the bond dimension. Our approach constructs pure-state decompositions of noisy or lossy input states whose components remain weakly entangled after circuit evolution, thereby providing a means to systematically explore the boundary between quantum-hard and classically-simulable regimes. For boson sampling, we analyze single-photon, Fock, and cat-state inputs, showing that classical simulability emerges at transmission rates scaling as $O(1/\sqrt{N})$, reaching the known boundary of quantum advantage with a tunable and scalable method. Beyond reproducing previous thresholds, our algorithm offers significantly improved control over the accuracy-efficiency trade-off. It further extends the applicability of MPS-based simulation to broader classes of noisy quantum sampling models, including IQP circuits.
arXiv:2510.24137 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2510.24137v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 206 words
Related coverage

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026

Parameter-Shift Rules Cut Boson Sampling Gradient Calculations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 13, 2026

New theory ranks the complexity of quantum system simulations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 13, 2026

Quantifying mixed-state entanglement via partial transpose and realignment moments
Quantum Journal · Aug 19, 2026