Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper unifies fragmented literature on optimization within AI systems, establishing mathematical programming as a disciplined interface between predictive models and constrained decision-making tasks. By standardizing notation across diverse applications like inference routing and distribution shift protection, it clarifies the tractability and scalability limits of various optimization paradigms for researchers and engineers.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, SiliconANGLE, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Mathematical Programming in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: A Unified Taxonomy of Models and Applications

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.07254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mathematical programming provides a common language for many decisions embedded in modern machine-learning (ML) and artificial-intelligence (AI) systems: selecting retrieval context, routing tokens, allocating inference compute, fitting structured predictors, protecting against distribution shift, and balancing competing objectives. However, the relevant literature is fragmented across optimization, information retrieval, recommendation, natural-language processing, computer vision, and learning theory. This paper organizes various applications under common mathematical programming paradigms: linear, quadratic, binary and mixed-integer, conic, bilevel, multi-objective, inverse, distributionally robust, submodular, and min--max optimization. We normalize the models with a mostly unified notation and, for every application, identify inputs, decision variables, a principal formulation, structural properties, solution strategies, and limitations. Across paradigms, we compare tractability, relaxation quality, decomposition, approximation guarantees, and scalability bottlenecks. The paper shows that mathematical programming is most useful not as a claim that all learning is LP or MIP, but as a disciplined interface between predictions and constrained decisions.

Abstract:Mathematical programming provides a common language for many decisions embedded in modern machine-learning (ML) and artificial-intelligence (AI) systems: selecting retrieval context, routing tokens, allocating inference compute, fitting structured predictors, protecting against distribution shift, and balancing competing objectives. However, the relevant literature is fragmented across optimization, information retrieval, recommendation, natural-language processing, computer vision, and learning theory. This paper organizes various applications under common mathematical programming paradigms: linear, quadratic, binary and mixed-integer, conic, bilevel, multi-objective, inverse, distributionally robust, submodular, and min--max optimization. We normalize the models with a mostly unified notation and, for every application, identify inputs, decision variables, a principal formulation, structural properties, solution strategies, and limitations. Across paradigms, we compare tractability, relaxation quality, decomposition, approximation guarantees, and scalability bottlenecks. The paper shows that mathematical programming is most useful not as a claim that all learning is LP or MIP, but as a disciplined interface between predictions and constrained decisions.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.07254 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2609.07254v1 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07254 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage