Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study introduces MEDS, a comprehensive dataset evaluating how large language models reason about mathematics under different persona conditions. The research reveals critical insights into LLM biases, including the emergence of human-like negative attitudes toward math and tendencies toward overconfidence or logical fallacies when acting as AI assistants versus humans. For developers building educational tools, this resource offers essential data for creating safer, more psychologically aware AI tutors that accurately reflect student anxieties and performance gaps.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Math Education Digital Shadows for Investigating Learning with GenAI: Mathematics Performance, Anxiety, and Confidence in LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.27618v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Understanding the impact of large language models (LLMs) on mathematics education requires data on LLMs' mathematical performance and biases. To this end, we introduce Math Education Digital Shadows (MEDS), a dataset mapping how LLMs reason about mathematics across human- and AI-like personifications. MEDS comprises 28,000 runs from 14 LLMs (i.e., Mistral, Qwen, DeepSeek, IBM Granite, Microsoft Phi, and xAI Grok) generated under human-shadow and AI-assistant conditions. Each record (digital shadow) includes a set of prompts; psychological and sociodemographic metadata; and four mathematics tasks: (i) interviews about relationships with mathematics, (ii) three psychometric questionnaires on mathematics self-efficacy and anxiety, (iii) one cognitive network capturing attitudes towards mathematics, and (iv) 18 high-school mathematics quiz items enriched with reasoning explanations and confidence scores. Analyses of the data show that LLMs exhibit differences in attitudes and performance across human-shadow and AI-assistant modes, including human-like negative attitudes towards mathematics, logical fallacies, and overconfidence in mathematics. As a data resource, MEDS can benefit learning scientists and developers of safer AI tutors in mathematics.

Abstract:Understanding the impact of large language models (LLMs) on mathematics education requires data on LLMs' mathematical performance and biases. To this end, we introduce Math Education Digital Shadows (MEDS), a dataset mapping how LLMs reason about mathematics across human- and AI-like personifications. MEDS comprises 28,000 runs from 14 LLMs (i.e., Mistral, Qwen, DeepSeek, IBM Granite, Microsoft Phi, and xAI Grok) generated under human-shadow and AI-assistant conditions. Each record (digital shadow) includes a set of prompts; psychological and sociodemographic metadata; and four mathematics tasks: (i) interviews about relationships with mathematics, (ii) three psychometric questionnaires on mathematics self-efficacy and anxiety, (iii) one cognitive network capturing attitudes towards mathematics, and (iv) 18 high-school mathematics quiz items enriched with reasoning explanations and confidence scores. Analyses of the data show that LLMs exhibit differences in attitudes and performance across human-shadow and AI-assistant modes, including human-like negative attitudes towards mathematics, logical fallacies, and overconfidence in mathematics. As a data resource, MEDS can benefit learning scientists and developers of safer AI tutors in mathematics.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)

arXiv:2604.27618 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2604.27618v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

From: Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili Dr. [view email] [v1] Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:08:58 UTC (8,141 KB) [v2] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:21:41 UTC (3,627 KB)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 218 words

Related coverage