aiqbench analysis
This research addresses critical vulnerabilities in open-source LLMs by introducing PRESTO, a method that strengthens safety alignment against Rank-Assisted Prefilling attacks. By optimizing token rank distributions rather than just probabilities during fine-tuning, the approach significantly improves model resilience without relying on complex infrastructure changes. This work is essential for developers seeking to harden frontier models against emerging jailbreak techniques while maintaining open-source accessibility.
Matching Ranks Over Probability Yields Truly Deep Safety Alignment
arXiv:2512.05518v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) play a critical role in the democratization of AI, yet their "open" nature introduces more avenues for malicious actors to misuse them for harmful purposes. A frustratingly easy but powerful technique known as the prefilling attack has been shown to effectively circumvent the safety alignment of frontier open-source LLMs by simply prefilling the assistant response with an affirmative prefix before decoding. A recent promising supervised fine-tuning defense proposes using a simple data augmentation scheme to achieve a "deep" safety alignment, allowing the model to generate natural language refusals immediately following harmful prefills. In this work, we show that a simple generalization of the prefilling attack, which we refer to as the Rank-Assisted Prefilling (RAP) attack, can effectively extract harmful content from models fine-tuned with the data augmentation defense by selecting low-probability "harmful" tokens from the top 20 predicted next tokens at each step (thus ignoring high-probability \enquote{refusal} tokens). We then propose a new perspective on achieving deep safety alignment by matching the token ranks in the underlying data augmentation target distribution (rather than just their probabilities), yielding a surprisingly simple approach to strengthening deep alignment we call PRefill attEntion STOpping (PRESTO) that regularizes the attention placed on harmful prefill tokens. Compared to just using data augmentation, PRESTO yields up to a 4.7x improvement in safety under RAP attacks across three popular LLMs. By achieving a stronger level of safety against practical and accessible attacks, our work paves a path towards safer open-source models. The source code accompanying this paper can be found at: https://github.com/uiuc-focal-lab/push-forward-alignment
Abstract:Open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) play a critical role in the democratization of AI, yet their "open" nature introduces more avenues for malicious actors to misuse them for harmful purposes. A frustratingly easy but powerful technique known as the prefilling attack has been shown to effectively circumvent the safety alignment of frontier open-source LLMs by simply prefilling the assistant response with an affirmative prefix before decoding. A recent promising supervised fine-tuning defense proposes using a simple data augmentation scheme to achieve a "deep" safety alignment, allowing the model to generate natural language refusals immediately following harmful prefills. In this work, we show that a simple generalization of the prefilling attack, which we refer to as the Rank-Assisted Prefilling (RAP) attack, can effectively extract harmful content from models fine-tuned with the data augmentation defense by selecting low-probability "harmful" tokens from the top 20 predicted next tokens at each step (thus ignoring high-probability \enquote{refusal} tokens). We then propose a new perspective on achieving deep safety alignment by matching the token ranks in the underlying data augmentation target distribution (rather than just their probabilities), yielding a surprisingly simple approach to strengthening deep alignment we call PRefill attEntion STOpping (PRESTO) that regularizes the attention placed on harmful prefill tokens. Compared to just using data augmentation, PRESTO yields up to a 4.7x improvement in safety under RAP attacks across three popular LLMs. By achieving a stronger level of safety against practical and accessible attacks, our work paves a path towards safer open-source models. The source code accompanying this paper can be found at: this https URL
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2512.05518 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2512.05518v2 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05518 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 357 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026