aiqbench analysis
MASRubric introduces a novel framework for auditing information flow in multi-agent systems by automatically distilling failure patterns into reusable pitfall rubrics. This approach enables real-time validation of intermediate messages, significantly improving accuracy on math reasoning and code generation benchmarks without requiring reference answers at test time. The system effectively mitigates error propagation by dynamically retrieving relevant criteria to filter or revise agent outputs before they impact downstream tasks.
MASRubric: Auditing Information Flow in Multi-Agent Systems with Failure-Distilled Pitfall Rubrics
arXiv:2602.23258v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While multi-agent systems (MAS) excel at complex reasoning, they are vulnerable to errors that intermediate agents introduce and downstream agents build upon. Auditing intermediate messages before they propagate requires an explicit standard, yet evaluation rubrics are typically authored by domain experts or written against a reference answer, neither of which is available for an unseen message at test time. We present MASRubric, a MAS information flow auditing framework with failure-distilled pitfall rubrics. Offline, trajectories on which the MAS has failed are automatically distilled into a reusable bank of pitfall criteria, each describing a recurrent error by its underlying misconception, the reasoning situations in which it arises, and the check that would expose it. Online, the criteria applicable to each intermediate message are retrieved from this off-the-shelf bank and checked one by one, and the resulting satisfaction rate decides whether the message is broadcast, returned to its author with diagnostic feedback for revision, or withheld. Empirical results demonstrate that MASRubric enhances MAS performance on both fixed and dynamic frameworks, achieving average accuracy gains of up to 2.83 points on math reasoning benchmarks and 1.74 points on code generation benchmarks. Further analysis shows that the retrieved criteria vary systematically with task types, and that the audit effort tracks task difficulty. Moreover, the bank transfers without re-mining to a system with a stronger backbone, which makes more adaptive and more efficient use of it. Our code and dataset are released at https://github.com/TonySY2/MASRubric.
Abstract:While multi-agent systems (MAS) excel at complex reasoning, they are vulnerable to errors that intermediate agents introduce and downstream agents build upon. Auditing intermediate messages before they propagate requires an explicit standard, yet evaluation rubrics are typically authored by domain experts or written against a reference answer, neither of which is available for an unseen message at test time. We present MASRubric, a MAS information flow auditing framework with failure-distilled pitfall rubrics. Offline, trajectories on which the MAS has failed are automatically distilled into a reusable bank of pitfall criteria, each describing a recurrent error by its underlying misconception, the reasoning situations in which it arises, and the check that would expose it. Online, the criteria applicable to each intermediate message are retrieved from this off-the-shelf bank and checked one by one, and the resulting satisfaction rate decides whether the message is broadcast, returned to its author with diagnostic feedback for revision, or withheld. Empirical results demonstrate that MASRubric enhances MAS performance on both fixed and dynamic frameworks, achieving average accuracy gains of up to 2.83 points on math reasoning benchmarks and 1.74 points on code generation benchmarks. Further analysis shows that the retrieved criteria vary systematically with task types, and that the audit effort tracks task difficulty. Moreover, the bank transfers without re-mining to a system with a stronger backbone, which makes more adaptive and more efficient use of it. Our code and dataset are released at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2602.23258 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2602.23258v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.23258 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
Related coverage

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

A Candid Abacus AI Review: The All-in-One AI Platform for Professionals & Enterprises
KDnuggets · Sep 10, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026