aiqbench analysis
This research proposes "masked distillation," a technique to internalize the computational logic of long Chain-of-Thought traces directly into model parameters, thereby reducing inference latency and memory costs without sacrificing accuracy. By training student models to predict only solution tokens while using reasoning teachers for feedback, this method effectively decouples answer generation from verbose intermediate steps in Large Reasoning Models. The approach offers a practical pathway to optimize the efficiency of complex AI systems currently burdened by excessive token usage during reasoning tasks.
Masked Distillation: Internalizing the Chain-of-Thought in Language Models
arXiv:2607.22629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) produce long, explicit chains of intermediate steps before generating a final answer at inference time. These intermediate traces dominate latency, memory usage, and serving cost, even though the final answer correctness is not causally related to the trace correctness and the trace length is not a reliable indicator of the problem complexity. This raises a natural question: can the computation expressed in these intermediate tokens be internalized into the parameters of a language model, enabling it to produce answers directly (or with much shorter intermediate traces)? We introduce \textit{masked distillation}, a knowledge-distillation framework in which a student LLM is trained to predict only the solution tokens conditioned on the question, while a reasoning teacher provides feedback on the student's responses after conditioning on the question and its own CoT trace. We instantiate this framework in two settings: (i) a \textit{self-distillation} setting, in which the same model serves as the teacher in thinking mode and as the student in non-thinking mode, and (ii) a \textit{dual-model} setting, in which a larger reasoning teacher supervises a separate smaller non-thinking student over the solution tokens. By treating intermediate tokens as a scaffold which reasoning models use to fit over the solution tokens, We additionally vary the length of intermediate-token scaffolding the student is supervised on, interpolating between full internalization (the student emits only the solution) and no internalization (the student emits the full trace before the answer). We evaluate the framework through controlled experiments on two reasoning domains: GSM8K (grade-school arithmetic) and Countdown (a number-puzzle search task).
Abstract:Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) produce long, explicit chains of intermediate steps before generating a final answer at inference time. These intermediate traces dominate latency, memory usage, and serving cost, even though the final answer correctness is not causally related to the trace correctness and the trace length is not a reliable indicator of the problem complexity. This raises a natural question: can the computation expressed in these intermediate tokens be internalized into the parameters of a language model, enabling it to produce answers directly (or with much shorter intermediate traces)? We introduce \textit{masked distillation}, a knowledge-distillation framework in which a student LLM is trained to predict only the solution tokens conditioned on the question, while a reasoning teacher provides feedback on the student's responses after conditioning on the question and its own CoT trace. We instantiate this framework in two settings: (i) a \textit{self-distillation} setting, in which the same model serves as the teacher in thinking mode and as the student in non-thinking mode, and (ii) a \textit{dual-model} setting, in which a larger reasoning teacher supervises a separate smaller non-thinking student over the solution tokens. By treating intermediate tokens as a scaffold which reasoning models use to fit over the solution tokens, We additionally vary the length of intermediate-token scaffolding the student is supervised on, interpolating between full internalization (the student emits only the solution) and no internalization (the student emits the full trace before the answer). We evaluate the framework through controlled experiments on two reasoning domains: GSM8K (grade-school arithmetic) and Countdown (a number-puzzle search task).
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.22629 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.22629v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22629 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 353 words
Related coverage
SpatialOPSD: Self-Distilling Spatial Intelligence from Verified Coding Agent Traces
arXiv · Oct 9, 2026

Opaque recurrence, and other AI terms that you should probably know
TechCrunch · Sep 7, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026