aiqbench analysis
This research presents an online actor-critic algorithm that jointly optimizes dynamic pricing and LLM-generated advertising to maximize revenue under uncertain demand. By integrating low-rank adaptation (LoRA) with policy gradient methods, the approach achieves significant performance gains over benchmarks that treat these tasks separately. The study provides a concrete example of how adaptive LLMs can be embedded into sequential decision-making frameworks for economic optimization.
Marrying Pricing and Advertising with LLMs
arXiv:2610.09985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study a sequential pricing problem in which a seller jointly posts a price and an advertisement generated by a large language model (LLM). The seller aims to maximize revenue under an unknown product demand that depends on both decisions, while observing only whether each offer leads to a purchase. We propose an online actor-critic algorithm that combines low-rank adaptation (LoRA) of a pretrained LLM with a demand model fitted to available data. At each round, the actor generates an advertisement, and the critic estimates purchase probabilities to guide price selection. Then, the resulting feedback is used to update both the actor and the critic, with the critic's revenue estimates providing a baseline for policy gradient updates of the actor. To evaluate our approach, we develop an evaluation framework with three synthetic demand models and a demand simulator built from real-world marketplace data. Finally, we compare our algorithm with benchmarks that do not jointly optimize price selection and advertisement generation, achieving expected revenue gains over the reference policy of 5.69%, 5.18% and 55.96% under the three synthetic demand models and 5.81% under the marketplace simulator.
Abstract:We study a sequential pricing problem in which a seller jointly posts a price and an advertisement generated by a large language model (LLM). The seller aims to maximize revenue under an unknown product demand that depends on both decisions, while observing only whether each offer leads to a purchase. We propose an online actor-critic algorithm that combines low-rank adaptation (LoRA) of a pretrained LLM with a demand model fitted to available data. At each round, the actor generates an advertisement, and the critic estimates purchase probabilities to guide price selection. Then, the resulting feedback is used to update both the actor and the critic, with the critic's revenue estimates providing a baseline for policy gradient updates of the actor. To evaluate our approach, we develop an evaluation framework with three synthetic demand models and a demand simulator built from real-world marketplace data. Finally, we compare our algorithm with benchmarks that do not jointly optimize price selection and advertisement generation, achieving expected revenue gains over the reference policy of 5.69%, 5.18% and 55.96% under the three synthetic demand models and 5.81% under the marketplace simulator.
Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.09985 [cs.GT]
(or arXiv:2610.09985v1 [cs.GT] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09985 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words
Related coverage
Ads in AI Chatbots? An Analysis of How Large Language Models Navigate Conflicts of Interest
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026
JEV versus LLMs: Accuracy, Cost and Calibration on Seven Political Science Replications
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026