Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Policy

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces MARLA, a conceptual framework designed to institutionalize regulatory learning within the EU AI Act's governance architecture. By structuring the translation of implementation evidence into legal knowledge across local, national, and European levels, it addresses the critical disconnect between technical practitioners and legal stakeholders. The work offers a non-prescriptive scaffold for adapting socio-technical practices as AI technologies evolve, which is essential for maintaining consistent oversight in complex regulatory environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

MARLA: A Conceptual Scaffold for Regulatory Learning under the EU AI Act

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.04877v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The EU AI Act positions regulation as part of the infrastructure for safe, trustworthy and market-ready innovation. Realising this ambition requires regulatory learning: the evidence generated during implementation must be translated into governance and legal knowledge that supports consistent interpretation, effective oversight, and adaptation as technologies evolve. Yet the actors who produce this evidence and those who rely on it operate in different professional worlds. This paper proposes MARLA (Map, Assess, Report, Learn, Adapt), a conceptual scaffold organising regulatory learning as a five-stage cycle centred on the implementation of legal requirements into socio-technical practices, situated at the Local, National and European levels of the AI Act's governance architecture. Deliberately non-prescriptive, MARLA gives technical and legal stakeholders a shared vocabulary in which each of the first three stages generates its own documentable form of regulatory learning. We illustrate the scaffold with two piloted case studies and a prospective National-to-European illustration.

Abstract:The EU AI Act positions regulation as part of the infrastructure for safe, trustworthy and market-ready innovation. Realising this ambition requires regulatory learning: the evidence generated during implementation must be translated into governance and legal knowledge that supports consistent interpretation, effective oversight, and adaptation as technologies evolve. Yet the actors who produce this evidence and those who rely on it operate in different professional worlds. This paper proposes MARLA (Map, Assess, Report, Learn, Adapt), a conceptual scaffold organising regulatory learning as a five-stage cycle centred on the implementation of legal requirements into socio-technical practices, situated at the Local, National and European levels of the AI Act's governance architecture. Deliberately non-prescriptive, MARLA gives technical and legal stakeholders a shared vocabulary in which each of the first three stages generates its own documentable form of regulatory learning. We illustrate the scaffold with two piloted case studies and a prospective National-to-European illustration.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.04877 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.04877v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04877 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 243 words

Related coverage