Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research advances adaptive inverse reinforcement learning by utilizing Malliavin calculus to efficiently estimate counterfactual gradients, overcoming the inefficiencies of standard Monte Carlo methods in passive RL settings. By reformulating conditioning on zero-probability events as ratios of unconditioned expectations, the proposed algorithm restores optimal convergence rates for Langevin-based structures. The work represents a significant theoretical and methodological step forward in refining gradient estimation techniques critical for advanced machine learning agents.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Malliavin Calculus for Counterfactual Gradient Estimation in Adaptive Inverse Reinforcement Learning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2604.01345v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) recovers the loss function of a forward learner from its observed responses. Adaptive IRL aims to reconstruct the loss function of a forward learner by passively observing its gradients as it performs reinforcement learning (RL). This paper proposes a novel passive Langevin-based algorithm that achieves adaptive IRL. The key difficulty in adaptive IRL is that the required gradients in the passive algorithm are counterfactual, that is, they are conditioned on events of probability zero under the forward learner's trajectory. Therefore, naive Monte Carlo estimators are prohibitively inefficient, and kernel smoothing, though common, suffers from slow convergence. We overcome this by employing Malliavin calculus to efficiently estimate the required counterfactual gradients. We reformulate the counterfactual conditioning as a ratio of unconditioned expectations involving Malliavin quantities, thus recovering standard estimation rates. We derive the necessary Malliavin derivatives and their adjoint Skorohod integral formulations for a general Langevin structure, and provide a concrete algorithmic approach which exploits these for counterfactual gradient estimation.

Abstract:Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) recovers the loss function of a forward learner from its observed responses. Adaptive IRL aims to reconstruct the loss function of a forward learner by passively observing its gradients as it performs reinforcement learning (RL). This paper proposes a novel passive Langevin-based algorithm that achieves adaptive IRL. The key difficulty in adaptive IRL is that the required gradients in the passive algorithm are counterfactual, that is, they are conditioned on events of probability zero under the forward learner's trajectory. Therefore, naive Monte Carlo estimators are prohibitively inefficient, and kernel smoothing, though common, suffers from slow convergence. We overcome this by employing Malliavin calculus to efficiently estimate the required counterfactual gradients. We reformulate the counterfactual conditioning as a ratio of unconditioned expectations involving Malliavin quantities, thus recovering standard estimation rates. We derive the necessary Malliavin derivatives and their adjoint Skorohod integral formulations for a general Langevin structure, and provide a concrete algorithmic approach which exploits these for counterfactual gradient estimation.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2604.01345 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2604.01345v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01345 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words

Related coverage