aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical challenge of maintaining machine learning classifiers for IoT device identification amidst concept drift, proposing a strategy that separates sample selection from labeling volume optimization. By combining uniform traffic sampling with conformity-based drift detection, the study demonstrates how to efficiently restore classifier performance using raw IPFIX flow records while providing feature-level explanations for behavioral evolution. This approach offers practical guidance for enterprise and ISP networks seeking to sustain security management capabilities without incurring excessive manual labeling costs.
Maintaining IoT Device Identification under Concept Drift via Budget-Aware Traffic Labeling
arXiv:2608.15465v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Identification of IoT device types from passive traffic is increasingly used for security management in enterprise and ISP networks. However, the performance of machine learning-based classifiers gradually degrades under concept drift as device behavior evolves. Therefore, maintaining classification performance requires periodic retraining with newly labeled deployment traffic. The operational challenge is determining how much and which deployment traffic instances to label for maintaining classification performance. We show that these two decisions should be treated separately. While retraining solely on instances selected by a drift detector is prone to systematically overlooking parts of the emerging behavioral space, uniformly sampled deployment traffic captures more representative behavioral changes. Instead, drift detection is more effective at determining the amount of deployment traffic that should be labeled. We make three contributions. (1) We conduct a two-year longitudinal study of IoT traffic and characterize how behavioral evolution manifests across device classes and how retraining with newly labeled traffic restores classification performance. (2) We develop a conformity-based drift detector that captures class-conditional behavioral models directly from raw traffic features and provides feature-level explanations of behavioral evolution. (3) We demonstrate that adjusting the traffic labeling rate according to the observed behavioral evolution, combined with uniform traffic sampling, maintains classifier performance more effectively than detector-guided sample selection and is beneficial to managing the traffic labeling effort. We further show that this strategy performs comparably to confidence-guided adaptation while providing feature-level explanations. Our evaluation uses 3.8 million IPFIX flow records collected from 21 IoT types over more than 2 years.
Abstract:Identification of IoT device types from passive traffic is increasingly used for security management in enterprise and ISP networks. However, the performance of machine learning-based classifiers gradually degrades under concept drift as device behavior evolves. Therefore, maintaining classification performance requires periodic retraining with newly labeled deployment traffic. The operational challenge is determining how much and which deployment traffic instances to label for maintaining classification performance. We show that these two decisions should be treated separately. While retraining solely on instances selected by a drift detector is prone to systematically overlooking parts of the emerging behavioral space, uniformly sampled deployment traffic captures more representative behavioral changes. Instead, drift detection is more effective at determining the amount of deployment traffic that should be labeled. We make three contributions. (1) We conduct a two-year longitudinal study of IoT traffic and characterize how behavioral evolution manifests across device classes and how retraining with newly labeled traffic restores classification performance. (2) We develop a conformity-based drift detector that captures class-conditional behavioral models directly from raw traffic features and provides feature-level explanations of behavioral evolution. (3) We demonstrate that adjusting the traffic labeling rate according to the observed behavioral evolution, combined with uniform traffic sampling, maintains classifier performance more effectively than detector-guided sample selection and is beneficial to managing the traffic labeling effort. We further show that this strategy performs comparably to confidence-guided adaptation while providing feature-level explanations. Our evaluation uses 3.8 million IPFIX flow records collected from 21 IoT types over more than 2 years.
Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.15465 [cs.NI]
(or arXiv:2608.15465v1 [cs.NI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15465 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 353 words
Related coverage
.webp%3Fssl%3D1&w=320)
Top 50 Best Penetration Testing Companies in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Jul 31, 2026

Spider - Man : Brand New Day Wearable AI Cannot Exist Yet : Real Power - Budget Wall Stands in Its Way
techtimes.com · Aug 3, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · Jun 15, 2026