Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses the fragility of task-oriented conversational agents by introducing MADS, a synthetic data pipeline that generates adversarial dialogue trajectories to simulate non-cooperative user behavior. By constructing MADS-Bench with over 1,000 conversations where roughly two-thirds contain failure scenarios, the work provides essential training resources for developing robust models via supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards. The research directly advances machine learning safety and reliability by ensuring agents can handle realistic, unhappy paths rather than idealized interactions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

MADS: Multi-Agent Dialog Simulation for Robust Conversational Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.12757v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task-oriented conversational agents remain fragile under realistic conditions, especially when users exhibit non-cooperative behavior. Existing function-calling benchmarks underrepresent adversarial conversation trajectories, thereby limiting the training resources available for developing robust agents. We present MADS (Multi-Agent Dialog Simulation), a synthetic data generation pipeline that produces structured, diverse dialogue trajectories. We inject adversarial conversation, producing validated conversation trajectories that capture realistic, unhappy paths. Using MADS, we construct MADS-Bench: a benchmark spanning six domains, 55 personas, and 1095 conversations, with approximately 66% of conversations containing failure-prone conversation scenarios. We evaluate the robustness of the trained models using a two-stage training approach that combines supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR).

Abstract:Task-oriented conversational agents remain fragile under realistic conditions, especially when users exhibit non-cooperative behavior. Existing function-calling benchmarks underrepresent adversarial conversation trajectories, thereby limiting the training resources available for developing robust agents. We present MADS (Multi-Agent Dialog Simulation), a synthetic data generation pipeline that produces structured, diverse dialogue trajectories. We inject adversarial conversation, producing validated conversation trajectories that capture realistic, unhappy paths. Using MADS, we construct MADS-Bench: a benchmark spanning six domains, 55 personas, and 1095 conversations, with approximately 66% of conversations containing failure-prone conversation scenarios. We evaluate the robustness of the trained models using a two-stage training approach that combines supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR).

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.12757 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.12757v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12757 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 205 words

Related coverage