aiqbench analysis
This study evaluates the efficacy of boosted decision trees versus optimized rectangular cuts for selecting invisible dark bosons at the Electron-Ion Collider, finding only marginal gains when utilizing nuclear four-momentum transfer data. The research underscores the nuanced role of machine learning in high-energy physics phenomenology, where traditional statistical methods often remain competitive with complex models. These findings provide a critical benchmark for future ML applications in exclusive processes involving reconstructed momentum variables.
Machine Learning for Invisible Dark Boson Searches at the Electron-Ion Collider
arXiv:2609.22484v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate whether adding $t$, the positive magnitude of the squared nuclear four-momentum transfer, enables boosted decision trees (BDTs) to improve invisible-dark-boson selection relative to optimized rectangular cuts at the Electron-Ion Collider. We model coherent exclusive scalar and vector production at generator level in electron-gold collisions at 18 GeV by 100 GeV per nucleon. Both methods use identical weighted samples, inputs, preselection, and optimization objectives. Using only electron information, the BDT provided no consistent advantage over optimized cuts for signal selection across 11 masses for each boson type. When both methods also use $t$, the BDT distinguishes signal from background slightly better than optimized cuts at 10 GeV for both boson types. These results motivate further investigation of machine learning in EIC dark-boson searches through exclusive processes where $t$ can be reconstructed.
Abstract:We investigate whether adding $t$, the positive magnitude of the squared nuclear four-momentum transfer, enables boosted decision trees (BDTs) to improve invisible-dark-boson selection relative to optimized rectangular cuts at the Electron-Ion Collider. We model coherent exclusive scalar and vector production at generator level in electron-gold collisions at 18 GeV by 100 GeV per nucleon. Both methods use identical weighted samples, inputs, preselection, and optimization objectives. Using only electron information, the BDT provided no consistent advantage over optimized cuts for signal selection across 11 masses for each boson type. When both methods also use $t$, the BDT distinguishes signal from background slightly better than optimized cuts at 10 GeV for both boson types. These results motivate further investigation of machine learning in EIC dark-boson searches through exclusive processes where $t$ can be reconstructed.
12 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables. Generator-level comparison of BDTs and optimized rectangular cuts for invisible dark bosons at the EIC
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Nuclear Experiment (nucl-ex)
arXiv:2609.22484 [hep-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.22484v1 [hep-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22484 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words
Related coverage

£13 Billion Collider Proposed as Successor to the Large Hadron Collider
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 7, 2026

CMS seeks dark matter in electron pairs far from collisions
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 24, 2026

Lost quantum traces could reveal dark matter at the Large Hadron Collider
newscientist.com · Sep 9, 2026

OpenRouter: from Seed to Stripe — with OpenRouter’s Alex Atallah & AMP’s Anjney Midha
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026