aiqbench analysis
This is a theoretical paper that redefines machine learning as successful computation backed by a formal derivation, extending Gödel's Representability Theorem to empirical targets. Its central claim is that learning a true probability requires both statistical consistency and an internal, formal derivation of that convergence, which i.i.d. assumptions alone cannot supply. The work is abstract and unvalidated against practical systems, so its value for readers lies in framing debates about what counts as learning and why modern hybrid AI systems (statistical proposers paired with deductive verifiers) may work, rather than in any immediately deployable result.
Machine Learning Beyond Statistical Consistency for Hybrid AI
arXiv:2611.01914v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose a new definition of machine learning, according to which a machine learns a function when it computes the function successfully, that is, when the value it returns for each input has a proper derivation in a formal system. We extend G\"odel's Representability Theorem, which equates computation with derivation, to empirical targets in two ways: the theorem is extended to the computable reals, and the data are admitted into the system as empirical definitions that record what has been observed. We prove that a machine learns a true probability if and only if two conditions are met. The Truth Condition is that its estimate converges to the true probability, which is statistical consistency. The Assurance Condition is that the machine properly derives its own convergence inside the system. Learning thus lies beyond statistical consistency, for it requires a derivation of the convergence from the record. A global assumption about the data, such as the i.i.d. assumption, does not supply such a derivation, because it leads only to a circular one, as we show for PAC learning. On the other hand, the two conditions are met for the probability of a sentence over a finite ideal corpus. A real machine can approximate a true probability only if an ideal machine can learn it precisely, that is, only in a domain that meets the two conditions. Modern AI works in such a domain, and we offer this as a clue to its success. Modern AI is hybrid as well, in two senses: First, it performs two kinds of tasks, namely probabilistic ones such as predicting the next word and deductive ones such as proving and coding. Second, it combines two parts of different kinds, a statistical proposer and a deductive verifier, for proving and coding. Our framework explains both senses of hybridity in one formal system.
Abstract:We propose a new definition of machine learning, according to which a machine learns a function when it computes the function successfully, that is, when the value it returns for each input has a proper derivation in a formal system. We extend Gödel's Representability Theorem, which equates computation with derivation, to empirical targets in two ways: the theorem is extended to the computable reals, and the data are admitted into the system as empirical definitions that record what has been observed. We prove that a machine learns a true probability if and only if two conditions are met. The Truth Condition is that its estimate converges to the true probability, which is statistical consistency. The Assurance Condition is that the machine properly derives its own convergence inside the system. Learning thus lies beyond statistical consistency, for it requires a derivation of the convergence from the record. A global assumption about the data, such as the i.i.d. assumption, does not supply such a derivation, because it leads only to a circular one, as we show for PAC learning. On the other hand, the two conditions are met for the probability of a sentence over a finite ideal corpus. A real machine can approximate a true probability only if an ideal machine can learn it precisely, that is, only in a domain that meets the two conditions. Modern AI works in such a domain, and we offer this as a clue to its success. Modern AI is hybrid as well, in two senses: First, it performs two kinds of tasks, namely probabilistic ones such as predicting the next word and deductive ones such as proving and coding. Second, it combines two parts of different kinds, a statistical proposer and a deductive verifier, for proving and coding. Our framework explains both senses of hybridity in one formal system.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2611.01914 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2611.01914v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.01914 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 402 words
Related coverage
Relative Density Ratio Optimization for Stable and Statistically Consistent Model Alignment
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
DySCo: Dynamically consistent data-driven downscaling of extremes in climate projections
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
Deep Learning for Random Objects in Metric Spaces: Beyond Manifold Assumptions
arXiv · Oct 23, 2026
Sobolev Regularized Score Difference Estimation in Diffusion Models
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026